Fracking: A Deadly Power Surge

July 15, 2013 | By | 7 Replies More

Fracking PennJill Richardson, Guest
Waking Times

Jacki Schilke was suffering from symptoms ranging from rashes, pain, and lightheadedness to dental problems and urinating blood. The formerly healthy, 53-year-old cattle rancher’s body was under assault from a list of toxic chemicals as long as your arm.

But Schilke’s lucky — so far — compared to five of her cows. They died.

The rancher’s problems might become worse in time, since the chemicals causing her acute problems are also linked to chronic, deadly diseases like cancer.

What’s afflicting Schilke and her cows? The oil and gas drilling craze known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. As The Nation magazine and the Great Plains Examiner reported last year, Oasis Petroleum started fracking on land three miles from her ranch in 2010. Oasis got money, the world got more energy from the gas they drilled, and Schilke got sick. Now, she won’t even eat her own beef.

If the results of fracking were virtually unknown a decade ago, before it became a common practice in states like Pennsylvania and Schilke’s home of North Dakota, there’s no mystery remaining now.

It shouldn’t be a surprise. After all, when you pump a cocktail of toxic chemicals into the ground to dislodge fossil fuels, there’s a cocktail of toxic chemicals in the ground. And some of those toxins don’t stay put. They make their way into the water, the soil, and the air.

And the toxins flow from there into the living things that rely on the water: the soil, the air, plants, animals, and us. We’re fracking our food.

Yet President Barack Obama is a big fracking supporter. He called natural gas a form of “clean energy” in the big address on global warming he delivered in June, touting the nation’s production of more natural gas “than any other country on Earth.” Then he said, “We should strengthen our position as the top natural gas producer because, in the medium term at least, it not only can provide safe, cheap power, but it can also help reduce our carbon emissions.”

Right. Compared to other forms of dirty energy, natural gas might reduce our carbon emissions. But at what cost?

If our only energy options were oil, coal, and natural gas, we’d be in a rotten Catch-22. Luckily, we have more choices than that. There are growing solar, wind, and geothermal options. Perhaps the most overlooked alternative is increasing efficiency.

I visited the University of Utah, in Salt Lake City, two years ago. The school had made a big effort to reduce its energy use. In one building, I saw a hallway that used to have its lights turned on all the time. The builders had never even installed switches to turn them off.

Decades ago, energy was “too cheap to meter.” It seemed cheaper to just leave the lights on all the time than to wire them to be turned off. That’s changed. After some retrofitting, the lights can be turned off.

How many other buildings and homes have no light switches, insufficient insulation, or old, power-guzzling appliances? How many are still being built without taking advantage of the most up-to-date methods that curb energy use?

Obama proudly spoke of doubling America’s use of solar and wind power in the last four years, with plans to double them yet again. He’s right. We increased wind and solar energy from less than 1 percent of our energy in 2007 to less than 2 percent in 2011. (Meanwhile, our reliance on natural gas crept up from 28 percent to 30 percent of total energy consumption, and our total use of energy overall rose in those four years by 9.4 percent — with most of the increase coming from dirty sources.)

Fracking might be profitable, but whether it’s good for anything else is doubtful. Emissions during the fracking process outweigh any benefits of reduced emissions when the fuel obtained is burned. Besides, how does fracking American land make sense if it’s poisoning our food and water supply with chemicals that give us cancer?

Let’s solve our energy problems by increasing efficiency and by turning to truly clean sources of energy: renewable options like solar, wind, and geothermal power.

About the Author

Jill Richardson is a columnist for OtherWords and the author of Recipe for America: Why Our Food System Is Broken and What We Can Do to Fix It. OtherWords.org

This article originally appeared at OtherWords.

This article is offered under Creative Commons license. It’s okay to republish it anywhere as long as attribution bio is included and all links remain intact.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Category: Activism, Activism Works, Agriculture, All Original Articles, Body, Business, Contributors, Earth, Earth Changes, Environment, Governance, Guest Writers, Healthcare, Ideas, Money, Natural Health, Plants, preparedness, Science, Self, Society, Technology, Time & Space, Uncategorized, Waking Times

Comments (7)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. dimitri ledkovsky says:

    Solar, wind, geothermal, tidal and the rest of them are high investment, high maintenance and low reliability. Fracking products and the other “fossil” fuels, and atomic, are also nutso to continue with. That’s the real conundrum. But the salient question is: Do we really need all this “energy” consumption? It hasn’t improved quality of life for countless billions. Only the sociopathic greedheads seem to need it to thrive. Does individual self examination stand a chance of pulling us out of the death spiral we’re in right now?

  2. annie says:

    You wont solve these problems until you “solve” your people, your politicians. it’s because americans can be bought – for peanuts essentially – that you are dieing, murdered by your own profit monsters.

  3. Chad says:

    Slightly off point, but I wish people would demand scientific evidence of nuclear energy, eg, a demonstration of uranium rods being put into water, thus making it boil. Our “belief” in nuclear energy is just a belief/faith/religion. I spent several months contacting many major university physics departments/professors, and all the major nuclear commissions and activist organizations, and I cannot find a single piece of scientific evidence for nuclear energy/bombs. The mathematics is all based on 1940s testing data made by a select few individuals. I won’t waste time or space on this, but if you can grasp the nuclear theories and care to investigate scientifically, the evidence rests on data of a very few individuals. Nuclear reactors could be indigent crematories for all we know. Also, methane is as pure “carbon-emitting” as you can get – it breaks down into H20 & CO2, but can’t we let the “global warming” thing rest? Everybody should be aware of the scientific frauds relating to this.
    All you have to do is look at chemtrails to notice “climate change” within a few hours. Humanity may go mad trying to accomodate more and more with less and less. There is no Star-Trek future (cosmic radiation can’t imaginably be overcome), and this is all we got, and when people exceed resources, they become cannibals, fact.

  4. Chad says:

    “Let’s solve our energy problems by increasing efficiency and by turning to truly clean sources of energy: renewable options like solar, wind, and geothermal power.” — I agree with the other poster: these things are not “efficient”. It takes almost as much energy to make, maintain, and dispose of a solar cell as it does to manufacture it; and wind turbines are one of the most expensive forms of generating electricty and they operate unpredictably. Geothermal is nice, but very expensive. Blacklightpower.com seems to offer a nearly free form of energy, but I am not sure this is positive. Mankind may simply go nuts with “free energy” and it will be the final deathblow to anything near “natural life” on the entire planet. Antarctica could become a giant NYC, and the world could have 100 billion people – I don’t want to live in that world. I wish I was born 100 years ago :) Some people are more fascinated by nature than by people, and they have no place in that future.
    Also, “increasing efficiency” is just another way of complaining “there is not enough to go around”, which applies to a wide range of resources. There are 8 billion sq.mi. of arable land on earth, about 8 Alaska’s, for all wood products, clothing/medicinal/food/animal crops, ranching, etc, and that works out to about 44x44yds per person, which is very minimal. Not many agree, but population growth is the most major underlying factor to all major problems on earth. Maximum population is not Optimal population. The scary part is that when population growth stops, economic growth stops, and the entire system collapses, and we revert back to the agrarian age or earlier almost instantly, and all you got is what you got, and if you “ain’t got land, you ain’t got s….”

  5. Chad says:

    Sorry, I meant “8 million sq.mi.” above, not “8 billion”.

  6. Chad says:

    The only things we count by the billions on earth are microrganisms, insects, grains of sand, and humans :)

    • sunny says:

      @Chad….add another…..billions of $. Yep, all that greed by a select few. What I would do with billions to help this planet…..
      Peace to you and yours.

Leave a Reply

Must Watch Videos

Vitamin D for Depression, Dementia, and Diabetes

Vitamin D for Depression, Dementia, and Diabetes













Dr. Mercola
Waking Times

Vitamin D research has repeatedly shown that vitamin D can improve a number of brain disorders, including depression and dementia—the most devastating form of which is Alzheimer’s disease.

Vitamin D receptors appear in a wide variety of brain tissue early in the fetal development, and activated … More

August 21, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More
Mass Produced Security Robots Introduced in U.S.

Mass Produced Security Robots Introduced in U.S.













Waking Times

While debate continues to rage about the threat of autonomous “killer robots,” the mechanized replacement of humans continues across the workforce. In fact, the robotics industry notched record sales in the first half of 2014 in North America, and there appears to be no indications of a slowdown.… More

August 19, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More
The Bitcoin Novelty – A Revolutionary Idea

The Bitcoin Novelty – A Revolutionary Idea













Kevin Sterne, Contributor
Waking Times

Even though the crypto currency, Bitcoin, isn’t exactly new, it still hasn’t infiltrated the mainstream ethos. But it’s getting there. You may have heard the term outside the fringe Internet message boards, or dark bar alleyways—that seemingly hacker-fancied geekdom thing that probably sprang from … More

August 19, 2014 | By | 2 Replies More
Happy Ending? Or Happy Now

Happy Ending? Or Happy Now













Zen Gardener, Guest
Waking Times

No matter where I turn the awakening is screaming out at me. Every event and announcement of intention by the dark side, no matter how destructive and disturbing, is only precipitating more conscious awareness and very present, personal involvement by humanity. It’s a thrilling … More

August 14, 2014 | By | 2 Replies More
Could This be the First News Channel Run by Teens?

Could This be the First News Channel Run by Teens?













Heather Callaghan, Contributor
Waking Times

Politics affects everyone, so everyone deserves a voice; especially the youth…

It seems like everywhere I go online, I am met with the diligence of Andrew Demeter. I wrote about his award-winning mini-documentary “We The People, Genetically Modified.” Expertly produced, it encompassed a … More

August 12, 2014 | By | Reply More

Activism Works

As Keystone XL Dominoes Fall, Time to Arrest Tar Sands Industry

As Keystone XL Dominoes Fall, Time to Arrest Tar Sands Industry













, EcoWatch
Waking Times

We’ve got this.

Thanks to the courageous and indefatigable efforts of pipeline fighters everywhere, the tide has finally turned on Keystone XL. As it becomes increasingly clear that Keystone XL’s northern leg is not going through, it is time to set our sights … More

August 4, 2014 | By | 2 Replies More
Seizing Control of Our Destinies

Seizing Control of Our Destinies













Julian Rose, Contributor
Waking Times

In 1381, at a time of great repression for the British agricultural work force, an extraordinary people’s revolutionary named Wat Tyler sprang to his feet and announced, “England should be a nation of self governing communities,” to which he added, “ No lord shall exercise … More

July 28, 2014 | By | 5 Replies More
Triumph For Citizens in Florida As Hughes Oil Company Drops Fracking Project

Triumph For Citizens in Florida As Hughes Oil Company Drops Fracking Project













Julie Dermansky, DeSmogBlog
Waking Times

On Friday morning, Dan A. Hughes Oil Company and the Collier Resources Company agreed to terminate their lease agreement, with the exception of the Collier Hogan 20-3H well, next to the Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary in Naples, Florida.

Hughes Oil dropped its plans to drill … More

July 14, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More
A Forgotten Community in New Orleans: Life on a Superfund Site

A Forgotten Community in New Orleans: Life on a Superfund Site













Julie Dermansky, DeSmogBlog
Waking Times

Shannon Rainey lives in a house that was built on top of a Superfund site in the Upper Ninth Ward of New Orleans.

“I bought my house when I was 25, and thirty years later, I still can’t get out,” she told DeSmogBlog.

Rainey’s … More

June 23, 2014 | By | 2 Replies More
Wave of GMO Labeling Victories Emboldens Movement to Take Back Food Democracy

Wave of GMO Labeling Victories Emboldens Movement to Take Back Food Democracy













Michele Simon, EcoWatch
Waking Times

The East Coast has been getting most of the attention lately on the state by state effort to label genetically-engineered food. Vermont recently passed a bill and New York State’s bill is now moving. But let’s not forget about the western states, which are also … More

June 11, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More