Brave Mad World: The Control of Mind and Body

Flickr - Ray Gun -PunkToadDouglas Chapman, Strange Mag
Waking Times

People who believe they have been targeted by mind control technologies have often been met with skepticism or outright disbelief. However, recent revelations concerning very real ongoing scientific research by the government, coupled with technologies under development in the private sector, make it harder than ever to completely dismiss these claims. Reliable information accessible on the Internet suggests that what they think is happening to them may actually be possible, either now or in the near future.

Many of us already have devices inside us — from pacemakers and artificial hearts to replacement joints. Now there is technology under development that could affect the mind and body from the outside, in disturbing, even maddening, ways — from putting sounds in people’s heads to microwaving them from within. The limits of thought and human physiology have been much extended.

There are also many documented cases of government abuse of unsuspecting citizens, often in the name of research. Political activists and others who upset the status quo have long known that government surveillance, at least under certain circumstances, is a reality.

Against this background, a subculture of individuals claim that sinister devices are being used on them, possibly by the government. If these machines are real, it would be difficult to separate the people who are mentally troubled from those who have been victimized. Few weapons, once developed, have not been abused. Even the “non-lethal” ones designed to incapacitate, like tasers, have been used to kill. Mind/body devices sometimes fall under this heading and can change a subject’s very concept of reality, which can be uneasy at the best of times.

Does the proliferation of new technologies and new complaints of harm indicate the spread of a large-scale form of mass paranoia? Or is reality catching up to what used to be called madness?

  • Uneasy Reality

    Those in the subculture call themselves Targeted Individuals, or TIs, and believe that they have been made “guinea pigs” in secret tests of mind-bending weapons. Their writings can be found on specialized websites, Internet forums, and blogs linked to articles on weapons development.

    The TIs are subject to a range of experiences. Primary among these is the hearing of voices. The voices may sound reasonable or irrational, comment on what the TIs are seeing or hearing, berate the TI with a string of abuse, or simply chatter nonsensically. TIs will also often experience random pains or electrical sensations throughout their bodies, as well as having feelings of being sexually stimulated or sexually “attacked” or of having their genitals manipulated. Above all they have an overwhelming certainty that these experiences are being caused by some outside agency, and cannot be a product of their own minds.

    Some have sought psychiatric care and have been given medication, but antipsychotic drugs often fail to alleviate the feelings.

    Could the TIs be the victims of non-lethal technologies? In the January 17, 2007 Washington Post, journalist Sharon Weinberger commented on the seeming normality of “TIs” until their conspiracy issues come into play.

    They experienced something, whether subjective or not, and they committed to their perceptions when they discovered the history of government abuses and learned about technology that may be able to produce the very sensations from which they are suffering. It is a veritable hall of mirrors, in which unusual beliefs get reinforced.

    Tech Secrets of the Pentagon Report

    The sources that all interested parties can call upon are extensive, but there is one government paper in particular that is a springboard to the entire subject — the no-longer-classified 1998 Pentagon report entitled “Bioeffects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons.” It was claimed to have been obtained via the Freedom of Information Act by someone in the controversial TI subculture, and its reality was authenticated in early 2008. The report is an overview of speculation and research concerning various technologies that could be developed for use as non-lethal weapons. There is much in the report to cause concern, but perhaps the most upsetting is the paranoid’s nightmare: a mention of an idea for creating a device that could be a “Voice of God”, to be used both as a communications machine and to distort a person’s mind. Deployed without ethical safeguards, such a machine, if developed, could harm the innocent as well as the guilty.

    Also in the report is discussion of a potential microwave weapon that could utilize electromagnetic pulses to disable the brain. On’s Danger Room blog, the aforementioned Sharon Weinberger profiled the highlights of the “Bioeffects….” report in a piece entitled “Report: Nonlethal Weapons Could Target Brain, Mimic Schizophrenia.” She noted that the military report lacked much context, and thus one could not know why it was written — and it did not specify present-day research or programs. Blogged comments about her piece ran the gamut, from mockers to alleged victims.

    Commenters on Weinberger’s posting included Donald Friedman, who had obtained the Pentagon report through the Freedom Of Information Act as part of a wider-ranging search. In his February 20, 2008 comment on the Danger Room blog, he blamed the Secret Service for persecuting him by means of the “microwave hearing/audio effect….”

    A recovering schizophrenic named “jay,” on a February 23 posting, pointed out that one’s own brain can create seeming sound effects. The existence of the technologies only “makes everything more difficult to figure out.”

    On March 24, 2008, a Danger Room blog, written by David Hambling, titled “‘Telepathic Ray Guns’ and Vaporized Shoes: The Truth is Weirder Then You Think,” deals with the Donald Friedman FOIA request and discusses “Bioeffects…”. Hambling had earlier written about the paper in the March 21, 2008 New Scientist, after a delay to make sure that the document was not a forgery.

    Friedman, believing himself to be government-targeted, took extreme steps in an attempt to put an end to his perceived persecution. On January 30, 2003, he visited an FBI field office and proffered a letter stating that he was going to get a confession from “at least one” agent “one way or the other….”

    Friedman did not achieve his stated objectives and his sanity became at issue.

    In the March 24 Danger Room, David Hambling notes that while it is easy to mock people of Friedman’s type, “On the other hand, it does show that if a nonlethal device ever was developed which could cause symptoms associated with madness, it would be completely deniable.” It might be handy “for some three-letter agencies.”

    Hambling suggests that “the rest of us are not paranoid enough” about military researches.

    State of the Developing Art

    These researches cover a lot of ground. The “Bioeffects…” report itself identifies and validates “some aspects of maturing nonlethal technologies that may likely be encountered or used as nonlethal effectors in the future…” which include “Laser and other light phenomena,” “Radio frequency directed energy” and “Aural bioeffects.”

    Prior to the report, studies of electromagnetic fields’ effects on biology had become more numerous because of the common devices making use of them, from microwave ovens to high-voltage transmission lines. Health factors were addressed, but the database was very incomplete.

    Different applications of microwaves have long affected animal behavior in various ways, from added or decreased ferocity to orientation in the environment. An object of study was to understand the effects on animals so that human susceptibilities could be further understood. The application of radio frequency (RF) radiation to an animal or person can mimic a fever in the subject and thus incapacitate. It can even be gradually introduced, so the subject does not at first realize it is being applied.

    The report mentions that it can be used on one or more individuals, thus making it a possible crowd-control device. Metal screens of various types can counteract its effects (making the often-mocked tinfoil hat solution appear more plausible than usual).

    The report also deals with the message-bearing and/or incapacitating effects of microwave audio and hearing. Usually experienced as ticking, knocking, buzzing or hissing sounds that seem to come from inside or just in back of the head, aspects of microwave hearing can be used both to distract people or to communicate by some message system like Morse Code or voice.

    Thirty years prior to the 1998 report the phenomenon was first noted in the scientific literature. A later 1975 study on humans showed “the threshold energy of microwave-auditory responses in humans as a function of pulse width for 2450 MHz radio frequency energy.” Thermoelastic expansion can be utilized to create the aural phenomenon, since a pressure wave can be caused in solids and liquids by a radio-frequency pulse. The effect can be tuned by altering RF energy characteristics. “Bioeffects….” mentions developing this to the point that human speech can be generated inside a person’s head without a nearby microphone picking up the talk. This has already been done to the point of communicating “one” through “ten” using “speech modulated” microwave energy.

    This effort is considered safe just so long as the experimentation does not exceed barely perceptible levels. Positive uses could include the transmission of private messages, but the report also points out that this could be disruptive and “psychologically devastating” to a person unaware of the technical effect — which would seem like a voice inside his or her head.

    Hostile uses would include the disruption of neural control — using electromagnetic pulses to bring on neural synchronization and thus make a subject lose control of his or her muscles. Depending on how it is applied, this could cause weakness, unconsciousness, or spasms.

    Sound by itself has powerful effects. When high levels of sound are applied, people’s eyes move around because of eddy current effects in the lateral ear canal — thus making the outside world appear to be spinning or turning. The vestibular receptors of the ear, which sense gravity and acceleration, can be stimulated in a way that makes a subject nauseous. Noisy jet engines have such an effect to the system. While such sound devices are very sophisticated, they are not yet very portable.

    Let There Be Light — and Sound

    Light is readily useable, and “Bioeffects…” covers the three main damages achievable with lasers — the “chemical, thermal, and mechanical or acoustic-mechanical” hazards. Tissues irradiated by lasers suffer photochemical damage. The skin and the eyes are most sensitive to this. Lasers can blind (permanently or temporarily) or dazzle with glare, or cause flash-blinding night-blindness. Any of these — or other eye damages — can badly effect the performance of a mission and mar a life.

    “Bioeffects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons” was finally regraded as unclassified on December 6, 2006. Moral issues are not its direct subject though the issues are implicit. Others would take those topics on. was one of the many websites to mention this 1998 Pentagon report and its low-key aftermath (where no public uses of the technologies were much noted) in the February 18, 2008 article by Lisa Zyga entitled “Pentagon report investigated lasers that put voices in your head.” Responses to the article’s web appearance were typical. One “cmi” (a.k.a. “Christine”) posted on February 20 and commented that she has schizophrenia, and that: “I feel better knowing that my beliefs were true.” “Beth” posted on February 25, 2008, and noted the seriousness of taking over someone’s central nervous system. She wrote about the recent technologies for so-called “crowd control” and stresses that: “Perhaps the correct nomenclature should be ‘social control’.”


    Independently of the “Bioeffects…” fracas, Kingsley Dennis, a Research Associate at Lancaster University, U.K., published a relevant piece — about the effects to society — for the February 4, 2008 First MondayFirst Monday is a peer-reviewed open-access Internet journal hosted by the University of Illinois at Chicago. Dennis’ article (“Opening Pandora’s box: How technologies of communication and cognition may be shifting towards a ‘Psycho-Civilized Society'”) focuses on how today’s wireless technologies have been developing towards interfaces with the nerve functions of the brain. He takes a look at the unfortunate effects of some of this, as well as on wireless/sensor technologies, which may contribute to a future society which places more focus on preemptive strategies and social control.

    To examine the implications, Dennis tells of Project Pandora, a U.S. Project run by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research’s psychology division, which was dedicated to finding out health effects resulting from exposure to microwaves. This effort followed-up the Soviet Union’s aiming of microwave radiation at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow from 1953 to 1976 to charge Soviet listening devices, to block U.S. monitoring attempts at listening outside their embassy, and to affect the embassy employees. A 1972 Defense Intelligence Agency report feared that this was part of an effort to mass-brainwash U.S. Citizens.

    Soviet mischief aside, work to influence the mind was indeed going on. Dennis mentions the long-ago neuroscientific practices of Dr. José Manuel Rodriguez Delgado. Dr. Delgado was an acclaimed neuroscientist and a Yale University physiology professor. The New York Times Magazine in 1970 featured a cover story about him as the prophet of a society in which people could change the functions of their own mind. In 1952, Delgado had co-authored an important peer-reviewed paper about electrode implantations in humans. In 1963, in Cordoba, Spain, he controlled electrode-equipped bulls with a radio transmitter, to the point of stopping a bull that was charging him.

    José Delgado was one of the many who made mind control — and its abuses — plausible. He is most famous for his electrical brain stimulation research. He developed the stimoceiver, a radio-controlled device which both stimulated brain waves and broadcast the E.E.G. wave results on radio channels.

    John Horgan profiled the retired Dr. Delgado in the October 2005 Scientific American. Delgado’s brain chips were the factual basis for fictions like Michael Crichton’s novel The Terminal Man and movies like The Matrix — but in real life the devices have been used to treat Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, blindness, and many other afflictions. He originally came up with his techniques in order to minimize the need for lobotomies. From the early 1950s to the early 1970s his 25 human subjects, treated in a Rhode Island mental hospital, were the very ill whose disorders had been untreatable by other techniques.

    Delgado finds himself in the same position as other scientists whose pioneering works have been used in ways they did not admire. He maintains his research was supported by military and civilian agencies but not the CIA — despite the conspiracy theories that later cropped up. He states that brain chips cannot force someone to kill any specific target, since brain stimulation only increases or decreases aggression. (The TIs are nevertheless concerned about the uses of his work.) The year 1970 saw release of his publication Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society, which tends — in its emphasis on “conquering the mind” as a positive thing for society — to the evangelical and (unintentionally) ominous. The bizarreness that followed his fame included a woman who claimed that Dr. Delgado implanted stimoceivers into her brain, yet the doctor had never made her acquaintance.

    His work in Spain, which commenced in 1974, concentrated on noninvasive techniques such as special helmets that could send electromagnetic pulses to specified regions of the brain. As these could not be delivered from a distance, Delgado dismissed speculations in Omni (and in television documentaries) that people’s thoughts could be modified remotely.

    At least, this was the case with the techniques he was using.

    Playing God

    Of course, what Dr. Delgado had done with animals could be tried on humans. And subliminal persuasion — where signals only the subconscious mind can process are hidden within other media — could be part of the mix. Igor Smirnov, a researcher of the Russian Academy of Sciences, is a specialist in subliminals. He was consulted by staff from the FBI’s Counter-Terrorism Center when they wanted to influence David Koresh of the Branch Davidian sect during the ill-fated FBI negotiations with the cult leader. Smirnov’s idea was to plant subliminal audio messages in phone communications. One idea was for Charlton Heston to play the voice of God. The hidden “Holy” messages intoned by Heston would have been obscured under normal ones and heard subconsciously.

    Smirnov has spoken of vanquishing terrorism using acoustic influences. In 1991, he had shown to observers from the United States that transmission of infrasound — at a frequency beneath the threshold of normal hearing — could send sound messages conducted through bone.

    Kingsley Dennis notes that:

    “Military thinking in this area is beginning to shift towards a systemic viewpoint which considers the human as an open system rather than as a closed, bounded system.” As Dennis and others have emphasized: the “mind has no firewall.”

    World of Hurt

    In a world where terrorism is feared so intensely, older rules of engagement will give way to newer ones, the ethics of which have yet to be properly formalized. The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) in 2004 put together a brief about “controlled effects” of the electromagnetic spectrum to be used for making changes in people’s behavior and thinking. It reported about nonlethal force to make adversaries think and behave differently. The Active Denial System (ADS) is the most famous of these efforts. It is a directed-energy weapon system which aims 95 Gigahertz electromagnetic radiation at its subjects. Its targets feel a burning sensation which makes targets run for cover. It is intended, among other things, as a crowd control device.

    A December 24, 2008 story by the aforementioned David Hambling for New Scientist Tech covered developments at the U.S. Department of Justice’s research arm regarding non-lethal, but nevertheless dangerous, weapons to handle suspects and opponents.

    The National Institute of Justice’s project builds atop the Active Denial System technology, but its device deploys a few centimeters of short microwaves to more particularly target individuals. Despite the reported health hazards involved, they pale next to those of blunt trauma weapons.

    The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) already has a laser weapon, the rifle-like Personnel Halting and Stimulation Response (PHaSR for short) which has been used to dazzle opponents, but can be used to heat skin if an infrared laser is added to it. The weapon is being tested for situations such as law enforcement and prison use. Less far along is the NIJ’s microwave-based weapon, which more resembles the ADS. The PHaSR is smaller than the microwave weapon, but it can more readily do more permanent damage — especially of the blinding variety.

    Human rights activists take issue with all these weapons. “Torture at the touch of a button” is how Steve Wright, of Leeds Metropolitan University, sums it up. Amnesty International wants research on all these devices made public. A January 3 online posting by Ian Allardyce reminded how these weapons could be used to counter protests (including peaceful demonstrations) “without all the nasty TV pictures.” Other postings, also reacting to Hambling’s article, included those by individuals who complained of being on the receiving end of such technologies.

    The Active Denial System is meant to be deployed in brief bursts. Whatever the timing of its application, long-term problems (like DNA damage) and short term problems (like panicked crowds) would be concerns. Dr. Jonathan M. Gitlin, writing for the website Ars Technica in January 2007, is concerned that it will be used and abused by police departments, with deaths resulting like those from the uses of stun guns and tasers.

    The ADS is being marketed as Silent Guardian™. It is a bit unwieldy, at five tons, and is said to be effective up to 250 meters away. Its effectiveness can be negated by clothing, goggles and even tin-foil.

    John Timmer, writing for Ars Technica in October 2007, wonders if the “reduced consequences” (to the wielder) of deploying the device would cause users to rely too much on pain infliction.

    The prototype of the Active Denial System was exhibited at Georgia’s Moody Air Force Base in 2007. The machine, utilizing a rectangular dish, was mounted atop a Humvee. The reach of its beam was extensive, affecting subjects up to 550 yards away. According to the military, the penetration is slight, but produces discomfort. A journalist from Reuters was voluntarily shot at by it, and described the feeling as being like that from an extremely hot oven.

    There are other unpleasant ways to control crowds. A device called MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) is designed to use microwave audio — in which short pulses heat living tissue and create an inside-skull shock wave that the ears can hear — to control groups of people. It has a variety of other uses, especially for the military. When pulsed in a series, recognizable sounds can be manifested inside a person’s head. The Sierra Nevada Corporation commenced its development of the system as part of a research contract for the U.S. Navy.

    The system creates an effect that cannot be blocked out, nor is subject to the established safety limits for audio — since the sound it creates is not sent through the eardrums.

    The antenna of the machine will be configurable so that narrow and wide beams can be projected, allowing selection of one or many targets. But neural damage will be a possibility in any case. The Sierra Nevada Corporation maintains that a demo version could be in operation by 2010.

    Reading People and Their Minds

    Technologies have also been developed to assist soldiers and others. In one project, pilots undergo brain scans to evaluate fatigue, which can be compensated for by greater automation of their planes. Machineries can measure fatigue in other ways — and are useful in many types of vehicles. A driver’s eye movements can be photographed (blinking is significant). Hand pressure on the steering wheel and a person’s heat can be measured, the latter by a specially lined seat. These close the gap between living thing and machine, and make use of the fact that people’s bodies are, as Dennis puts it, the “most capable data-processing subject.”

    But measuring so closely has its downside. Dennis worries about a hypothetical future in which people will be scanned for “dangerous intentions.” Travelers will have to keep their thoughts safe as well as their bodies., on September 23, 2008, presented Allison Barrie’s article “Homeland Security Detects Terrorist Threats by Reading Your Mind.” The truckbed-sized MALINTENT is revealed as the new system to worry those who value their privacy. It was developed at the Science and Technology directorate of Homeland Security. MALINTENT uses imagers and sensors to note a subject’s respiration, heart rate and temperature in a search for the subtle signs dangerous people show before they attack.

    A field test was run in Maryland, with most of its participants unaware of their participation. It was set up under the cover of a bogus “technology expo.” As part of the trick, 144 of those tested were under the illusion that they were just going through an entrance, when they were actually traveling through screening sensors. The other 23 knew they were in a special project, and were told to carry a “disruptive device” when passing through the portal. When the people passed through, sensors first picked out if something was “off” or unexpected, and analysts (who did not know the identities of the “dangerous” 23) decided who needed to be noted for questioning. Scanning of small muscle movements was then done to get further information as to probable intention.

    The device used in that test is called FAST (for “Future Attribute Screening Technology”) and it is supposedly effective enough to be able to tell harassed and nervous travelers from those who are dangerous.

    There are ethical issues regarding privacy and storage, since the scan is like an unasked-for doctor’s examination. But, at this point at least, it does not keep data permanently. If the system is okayed for airports, it may take the place of some of the current security procedures.

    Kingsley Dennis shows in the First Monday article that the world of Steven Spielberg’s movie Minority Report — where a person’s mere intent is subject to discovery and prosecution — may not be so far away after all.

    Dennis reminds us that information flows around us in formats like cell phone broadcasts and television transmissions. Once we can decode many sorts of broadcasts and then transmit them from our re-wired bodies (where remote access technologies are plugged into our nervous systems), the world and civilization will alter in uncountable ways. What physicist Stuart Wolf calls “network-enabled telepathy” will be a reality, and wearable devices will be commonplace — and the new social order about which Dennis worries will become a reality. This is a world one in which the mind can be bedeviled by government surveillance, terrorists and programming experts.

    David Hambling’s March 21, 2008 article “US Army toyed with telepathic ray gun” on New Scientist Tech summarizes much of “Bioeffects of Selected Nonlethal Weapons.” He wrote about how some of the devices were in concept stage, while others had undergone tests or actual use. Since the writing of the report, Hambling notes, the Long Range Acoustic Device has actually been used, mostly notably when dealing with pirates off Somalia.

    Getting Inside Heads

    Getting sounds to individuals is not always so violent. Andrew Hampp, a reporter for Aftermath News,reported in a December 14, 2007 piece about the newly intrusive methods of advertising. He went to SoHo, New York, to check out an upsetting technology.

    Hampp wrote about Alison Wilson, who ventured down Prince Street in December 2007 and heard “Who’s there? Who’s there?” followed by “It’s not your imagination.” The seeming audio hallucination turned out to be connected with a billboard using an “audio spotlight” sent from atop a roof. It used Holosonics® to advertise the A&E Network television show Paranormal State.

    The Holosonics technology — which makes a narrow sound beam from a diminutive source — broadcasts sound that can be heard by one person but not people nearby. Joe Pompei, who founded Holosonics, says that ultrasound technology was originally designed to cut down on noise pollution by reducing the number of people who hear a noise. It does to sound what a flashlight does to light: directs it in a narrow fashion. Nevertheless it creates the illusion of the disembodied voices familiar to schizophrenics. It is showmanship, but it portends more troubling machines.

    Even more amazing are developments in the transmission and reception of mental data. Steve Connor, Science Editor for The Independent, related — in an article published on March 13, 2009 — that scientists were coming closer to reading people’s minds through decoding the electrical activity in their brains.

    It is now possible to learn where a person imagines himself to be physically — for example, his or her position in a visualized maze — without inquiring verbally. This is done using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) machines studying the activity patterns in the hippocampus area of the brain. Utilizing MRI, male taxi drivers in London — who have memorized the streets of their city — have been shown to possess an area behind the hippocampus that is larger than normal.

    Dr. Demis Hassabis, of University College London, comments that the technology is a decade away from reading a person’s thoughts without the subject’s cooperation during a brief session. The present work, according to Dr. Hassabis will help scientists learn how the hippocampus processes information, and how memories are diminished by such diseases as Alzheimer’s.

    Current Biology has published the results of the study, headed by Professor Eleanor Maguire of University College London, in which volunteers navigated through a computer’s virtual maze while being brain-scanned via MRI.

    Mind privacy is less an issue to those who have too much privacy. One much-publicized research project aims to help stroke patients and brain-injured soldiers by reaching into their disabled minds and extracting information needed to help them. A less-mentioned aspect of this technology is that it could be used to interrogate enemy combatants (or anybody else). The overall mission of the research is to find ways to read brain signals in order to decipher a person’s thoughts.

    The Army has granted $4 million to scientists at the University of Maryland, Carnegie Mellon University and the University of California at Irvine, who are all collaborating on the project. Michael D’Zmura, Professor and Chair of the Department of Cognitive Sciences at the University of California at Irvine, is working with a team including Gregory Hickok, Ramesh Srinivasan, and Kourosh Saberi, all cognitive science professors at UCI. The grant comes under the Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative program of the U.S. Department of Defense.

    Some of the tools being utilized in this “synthetic telepathy” are familiar. One of these technologies is electroencephalography (EEG) which is used to detect electrical activity in the brain via scalp electrodes. A test subject in these EEG experiments wears a cap equipped with electrodes and is asked to think of a chosen word. The brain activity is then analyzed.

    Over time, this analysis can be improved, and in the future will be assisted by thought-recognition software. A 128-sensor array will eventually be positioned within a helmet.

    D’Zmura notes that the research is “years away” from the type of mental telepathy in which a person can think freely with others knowing what is thought. This is because the “sender” will need to be trained to formulate a thought in a format that can be read via EEG. This rules out aggressively spying on people’s private thoughts. Cooperation will be needed. As long as this remains the case, the worst-case Big Brother-type scenarios cannot play out.

    But soldiers will be able to communicate without making a noise, and relay orders and other information. They will have to think loudly, but that is easier than talking quietly on other communications devices.

    D’Zmura envisions a future in which students communicate by thought rather than by texting. He also mentions EEG-based game devices that are not as bulky as those marketed at present, and which could be worn as a hat or a hood.

    Gaming with the Mind

    In Eric Bland’s article “Army developing ‘synthetic telepathy’,” published on on October 13, 2008, Paul Sajda, an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Columbia University, shares his ideas on thought-based gaming. At present, virtual objects can be manipulated using EEG headsets, which can pick up signals within one or two centimeters in the brain, notes Sajda. It will take much more detail to deal with “auditory” thoughts that translate into words. More work must be done to find out which phrases and words line up with which sections of the brain.

    A notable new device is the Neural Impulse Actuator from OCZ, which monitors both forehead muscles and brain activities. Algorithms are used to translate the brain and muscle signals into commands for game activities. Some who have tried the device feel that the furrowing of the user’s brows is what is doing most of the heavy lifting. Use of the Actuator improves over time as the device’s computer programs get to know one’s muscle/brain idiosyncrasies.

    Another gaming device is a brainwave headset, designed for computer games. Emotiv Systems’ headset is attuned to the brain. Its function is entirely motivated by the 16 sensors that scan brain electrical activity. Norman Chan of the magazine PC Gamer put the device on and within four seconds “levitated a mountain” (on a computer screen on one axis of virtual movement). The product was not then publicly released, but he wanted one for his very own.

    Sony, a giant in the gaming field, has gotten a patent on a device for, as Kingsley Dennis cites it, “transmitting sensory data directly into the human brain.” It works by sending ultrasound pulses to specified portions of the brain, which results in “sensory experiences.” Transcranial magnetic stimulation is its basis, and it affects the nerves using changes in magnetic fields. It it hoped that Sony’s patent will enable the deaf to hear and the blind to see.

    Add, to efforts like these, competitor Microsoft’s efforts to turn the entire body — especially skin — into computing devices and you have the world conceived by Bill Gates in which computers disappear into the environment. Technology is becoming less a matter of external hardware such as peripherals. Instead the need for computer hardware is declining as designers find ways to connect with the body’s own computational powers.

    Hacking may end up a problem, though. Hadley Leggett, in a news article posted online July 9, 2009 on Wired Science, writes of the possibility of hacking of the brain. While hackers often get into others’ computers, it would be more serious if the computers they cracked were inside people, controlling such devices as prosthetic limbs, artificial hearts, and brain stimulators. In 2007 and 2008 malign programmers installed harmful flashing animations into epilepsy websites, so it is only a matter of time before they try the same with neurological machines.

    “Hacking” Into the Brain — for Images

    Celeste Biever, in a December 12, 2008 story for New Scientist Tech, wrote about how software can now recreate what a subject sees by making use of nothing but brain scans.

    After some success at the University of California, Berkeley, where Jack Gallant and his associates demonstrated that they could identify which images their test subjects were observing by looking at brain scans, further steps have been taken. The ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories in Kyoto, Japan, have been the site of the newer MRI work. Yukiyasu Kamitani’s team made use of a brain-activity scanner image to recreate the image originally observed. Dr. Kamitani said. “By analyzing the brain signals when someone is seeking an image, we can reconstruct that image.” For example, the word “neuron” is recognizable from its software reconstruction.

    The eventual commercial usages will be fraught with privacy issues. Its medical uses will be less controversial most of the time. Patients unable to move will be able to reach out with their thoughts, and — through possible related “reverse” developments — blind people may be able to see. (What they could be made to see would be another matter.)

    An article in the U.S.-based scientific journal Neuron shows how it will also be possible through brain scans to interpret hallucinations and identify mental disorders.

    The next topic of study will be how dreams and experiences are realized in the brain. Privacy will be an issue when accuracy improves, since hidden images would be extracted when subjects are asleep. When one can peer into a person’s subconscious without his or her knowledge, the potentials of abuse are endless.

    Intrusions on privacy have taken place in the past. There is surviving evidence of nasty government doings, particularly by the CIA, at the expense of members of the general public.

    The Government Vigilantes

    Much conspiracy theory — whether “paranoid” or not” — concentrates on Project MKULTRA because so many of its documents were destroyed in 1973 at the order of CIA Director Richard Helms, and because the documents that remain tell a shameful story. Most famous of its misdeeds were drug experiments on American citizens at various levels of society, who were not told that they had been administered mind-altering drugs such as LSD. Control of the human mind was the overall objective.

    It became known to the public in 1975, after the Church Committee of the U.S. Senate (devoted to studying governmental intelligence operations and chaired by Senator Frank Church) and the Rockefeller Commission (the President’s Commission on CIA activities within the United States, headed by then-Vice President Nelson Rockefeller) investigated it by obtaining sworn participant testimony and reviewing the smallish number of surviving documents. It was revealed that Allen Dulles had ordered the creation of MKULTRA on April 13, 1953 due to the reports of enemy “brainwashing” efforts.

    Rules were broken in dealing with non-majority groups of various sorts, by different arms of the government. The Counter Intelligence Program of the FBI (COINTELPRO) dated back to 1956. While some of its efforts were devoted to subverting and marginalizing “white hate groups,” most of its efforts opposed so-called subversive efforts. Since the FBI’s motive was to maintain the status quo, progressives of various sorts were targeted. Eventually the Church Committee, after a 1976 investigation, castigated its work — calling it a “vigilante operation.” The techniques COINTELPRO used included infiltration (and use of agent provocateurs), psychological warfare, hoaxes, legal harassment, illegal force, and much unethical persecution.

    Because COINTELPRO did not play by the rules, it is easy to see why people who think they are persecuted by the government often cite this well-documented program as proof the government is up to no good. And it is these known inhuman actions that convince many — whether they feel they’ve been victimized or not — that the government is all too capable of mind control outrages. Whether or not these people are actually targets of mind/body control, history often repeats itself as regards resurgences of corrupt practices.

    Dr. Colin A. Ross, a noted specialist in dissociative disorders and post-traumatic stress disorders, has written about politically based abuses in the field of of psychiatry. His 2000 book, Bluebird: Deliberate Creation of Multiple Personality by Psychiatrists, describes deeds that would be at home in the movie versions of The Manchurian Candidate. His source material was 15,000 pages of CIA documents obtained through the FOIA. Ross claims that the abuses were not committed merely by renegades but by leading medical people. Dr. Ross is best known for his work on Multiple Personality Disorder (also known as Dissociative Identity Disorder or DID). There is a newer reprint of Bluebird… entitled The C.I.A. Doctors: Human Rights Violations By American Psychiatrists. Both editions describe experiments to create memories, identities, amnesia and access codes in people’s minds.

    The Targeted Individual subculture has taken especial note. On the Organized Stalking and Electronic Harassment ( website, Norma Lawrence reviews the book with an emphasis on subjects of interest to victims of electronic harassment. She mentions Ross’s citations of such unethical projects as the Tuskeegee Syphilis Study (where sick people were left untreated without their knowledge in the interests of information gathering). “The role of general medicine in Tuskeegee is the same as psychiatry’s role in mind control,” she relates. Such projects find individuals expendable. In MKULTRA projects, such horrors occurred as the injection of children with uranium, the dosing of the young with LSD, and even the installation of electrodes in preteens. MKULTRA’s subproject 119, Lawrence writes, concerned “Techniques of activation of the human organism by remote electronic means.”

    Also mentioned in the review are Dr. José Delgado’s uses of electrodes on cats, monkeys and people.

    Lawrence places emphasis on Dr. Ross’s revelations that the Masons funded a number of the unethical shrinks’ foundations. She points out that many of the doctors and researchers were Masons as well. Here, the bashing of Masons falls into step with pervasive bigotries — which can alienate readers who might find the rest more plausible.

    Organized Stalking and Electronic Harassment

    Organized stalking, as defined by those who feel they have been the victims of it, is the coordinated, continual long term harassment by a networked group of people who could be strangers to the target, acquaintances of the target, government agents or all of these. This stalking tends to take the form of vague incidents that may seem harmless in themselves but when taken collectively produce extreme discomfort, fear and paranoia in the victim. These can include such things as repeated hang up phone calls, strangers gesturing from a passing car, minor acts of vandalism on the target’s home or property, or any of a number of other repeated annoying behaviors directed at an individual by numerous others.

    The Organized Stalking and Electronic Harassment website is a center of TI communication, and there are other such sites in many countries. Its main pages, at and, cover many aspects of “Organized Stalking and Electronic Harassment” (OS/EH). Supervised by Eleanor White, the site uses the term OS/EH in preference of the more limited “mind control” and refers to it as the “near perfect crime.”

    Statistics are provided on-site for many kinds of stalking and harassment. The varieties of stalkers are enumerated. The website’s answer to why organized stalking and electronic harassment are not recorded in the official crime statistics is that: “They consistently used the ‘you are mentally ill’ method, with its implied threat of being forced into the mental health system, as their main blocking tactic.” They claim that if a person is actually targeted the usual channels for help are not available.

    Organized stalking, as described here (as a systematic destruction of every social and private aspect of a target’s life), is informed by the historical examples of MKULTRA and COINTELPRO, and is said to be done in the “community watch” style of the present day — a sort of neighborhood watch gone bad.

    Particularly feared on the OS/EH website are the uses of microwaves, including microwave ovens (altered to project through walls) and “voice to skull” technologies. Their worries are understandable enough but an outsider to the subculture would find some of it strange. One worry is “how well your possessions will work and how long they will work without breakdowns.” Common human aggravations like illnesses, and woes like the death of a pet, are taken as signs of persecution. Lists are presented of targeted people and the harms they experienced.

    Eleanor White bases her group’s case on the histories of MKULTRA, COINTELPRO, and the commercial and unclassified technologies. To her mind, the known facts prove her group’s claims, and she calls upon fellow Christians to pray, among other things, “that Satan’s grip on the perpetrators might be shaken loose.”

    The website includes a review for the 1979 book Search for the Manchurian Candidate by John Marks, which sources 16,000 pages of CIA documents obtained through the FOIA — with many details on MKULTRA. The review summarizes that “This book shows clearly that morally bankrupt people in positions of authority are not particularly rare, and the moral bankruptcy extends even to torturing fellow citizens.”

    Targeted Individuals and the Bigger Picture

    Sharon Weinberger provided a wider look at the subculture of people who think that the government is putting voices into their heads in an article entitled “Mind Games” in the Washington Post of January 14, 2007. She followed it up on January 16 with a Live Discussion on the Washington Post website in which interested parties (including many TIs) participated.

    In “Mind Games,” Weinberger describes the lingo used in a Saturday evening conference call involving TIs within the subculture, in which terms like “gang stalking” and “V2K” (short for “voice to skull”) were bandied about. “Gang stalking” describes what the group feels is happening to them — that they are being shadowed and harassed by strangers, by neighbors, or even by co-workers, who are government agents. The forum had, at that time during 2007, 143 members. One caller described her heavy use of aluminum foil in her clothes — even her hat. Derrick Robinson, the moderator of the call, described his gang stalking as beginning in the 1980s when he was working at the National Security Agency (NSA).

    One Californian Targeted Individual, after conducting interviews of some 50 fellow TIs, reported widespread symptoms of ear-ringing, voices, body part manipulation, skin sensations, sexual attacks and sinus problems. Assaults to sexual organs were described by TIs of both genders. One described how it felt “electronic.” This is so similar to “alien abduction experiences” as to be startling, and it was noticed by Susan Clancy, the Harvard psychologist who wrote the book Abducted. Of the seemingly abducted, she says: “It’s not just an explanation for your problems; it’s a source of meaning for your life.”

    And there have been well-known people who have had a TI or TI-like experience. Evelyn Waugh, the 20thcentury novelist, in a 1957 semi-autobiographical fiction entitled The Ordeal of Gilbert Pinfold, told of a man hearing voices which seemed to be broadcast into his head. (Waugh found that his own TI experience was due to some drugs.)

    TIs are confronted by basic questions. Did what happened to them actually happen? If it happens to many people, why is its importance minimized? Why are there so many things that would seem to be evidence that what happened was real? Weinberger sums up a major problem: “The very ‘realness’ of the voices is the issue — how do you disbelieve something you perceive as real?”

    In the follow-up, she sums up that, while many TIs are probably mentally ill, that “…not everyone who believes in strange things is mentally ill.” Hearing voices is not as uncommon as thought.

    There are a number of mysteries about the reality of the TIs’ situation. One is the wherewithal of the alleged persecutors. It would take a lot of money and time to set up the claimed mechanisms of torment. If research is the motive, what would be the uses of the information gleaned from politically insignificant people as compared to the costs of the research? In secretive prisons such as Guantanamo, techniques that slowly break down personality are put into use on people termed enemy combatants. How much of this was learned from the mind studies over the years?

    Cheryl Welsh, who responded positively to Weinberger’s Post article, heads Mind Justice, a “human rights group working for the rights and protections of mental integrity and freedom from new technologies and weapons which target the mind and nervous system.” The group’s website, at, has much information on mind-afflicting technologies and their history. One 2008 article in particular, written by Welsh, “In Contravention of Conventional Wisdom: CIA ‘no touch’ torture makes sense out of mind control allegations,” compares the mind-eroding effects of modern interrogation with the experiences of the TIs and likens the almost theatrical setups which unnerve the recipients of the “no touch” torture to the “street theater” described in the testimonies of alleged mind control victims. Welsh wonders who controls neuroscience weapons research and how advanced it is. She stresses the continued “lack of public input” to the policy of its use.

    The biggest mystery is what constitutes the present state of the art. The publicized technologies are fairly crude and most have a short range while the symptoms felt by TIs hint at more advanced machines that can work at great distances and without some of the limitations of known technology. Is the most sophisticated tech still Top Secret? Why is it that — after all these decades of research — no neurologically-based weapons have been publicly used?

    This leaves things at a strange nexus — where “crazy” beliefs and technological capabilities meet. The connection is unsettling, and is generally downplayed. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) proposed in 2001 — as part of a larger bill — to ban psychotronic weapons but met mockery from columnists and others.

    The scariest element of all is the biological/mechanical — or man/machine — interface. There could be a person who could see, hear, and mind-read too much — and to whom little would be private. What would such a presence do to human interaction and sanity?

    Are the problems feared by TIs and some of the rest of us actually a forerunner of things to come?


    “Bioeffects of Selected Nonlethal Weapons,” c/o Danger Room,,

    Hadley Leggett, “The Next Hacking Frontier: Your Brain?,” Wired Science,,, 7/9/09

    Sharon Weinberger, “Army Yanks ‘Voice-To-Skull Devices’ Site,” Danger Room,,, 5/9/08

    Sharon Weinberger, “Report: Nonlethal Weapons Could Target Brain, Mimic Schizophrenia,” Danger Room,,, 2/18/08

    Sharon Weinberger, “Mind Games,” Washington Post, 1/14/07

    Sharon Weinberger, Post Magazine: “Mind Control,” (Live Discussion with Post Magazine writers),, 1/16/07

    David Hambling, “US police could get ‘pain beam’ weapons,” New Scientist Tech,, 12/24/08

    David Hambling, “Microwave Ray Gun Controls Crowds with Noise,” ABC News,, 7/4/08

    David Hambling, “‘Telepathic Rays Guns’ and Vaporized Shoes: The Truth is Weirder Than You Think,” Danger Room,,, 3/24/08

    David Hambling, “US Army toyed with telepathic ray gun,” New Scientist,, 3/21/08

    Kingsley Dennis, “Opening Pandora’s box: How technologies of communication and cognition may be shifting towards a ‘Psycho-Civilized Society’,” First Monday: Peer-Reviewed Journal On The Internet, Volume 13, Number 2 — 4 February 2008

    Lisa Zyga, “US Army Invests in ‘Thought Helmet’ Technology for Voiceless Communication,”,, 9/22/08

    Lisa Zyga, “Pentagon report investigated lasers that put voices in your head,”,, 2/18/08

    “Scientists to study synthetic telepathy,”,, 8/13/08

    “Organized Stalking and Electronic Harassment,”

    “Organized Stalking and Electronic Harassment — Rest of Site,”

    Norma Lawrence, Review of Bluebird by Dr. Colin Ross,

    “Voice to skull devices,” FAS,, 3/25/04

    Yoko Kubota, “What are you looking at? Scientists find out,” MSNBC (from Reuters),, 1/7/09

    Allison Barrie, “Homeland Security Detects Terrorist Threats by Reading Your Mind,” Fox News,,2933,426485,00.html, 9/23/08

    366 F.3d 975, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, [U.S. v. Donald Friedman],, Submitted February 27, 2004, Filed May 6, 2004

    Jonathan M. Gitlin, “Burn, baby, burn,” Ars Technica,, 1/25/07

    John Timmer, “Nonlethal microwave pain beam hits the market,” Ars Technica,, 10/10/07

    “US military unveils heat-ray gun,” BBC News,, 1/25/07

    Andrew Hampp, “Hear Voices? It May Be an Ad,” Aftermath News,, 12/14/07

    Eric Bland, “Army developing ‘synthetic telepathy’,”,, 10/13/08

    New Zealand Herald,, 8/18/08

    Michael D’Zmura,

    Steve Connor, “Scientists able to read people’s minds,” The Independent,, 3/13/09

    Celeste Biever, “‘ Mind-reading’ software could record your dreams,” New Scientist Tech,, 12/12/08

    Mark Thompson, “The Army’s Totally Serious Mind-Control Project,”,,8599,1841108,00.html, 9/14/08

    Colin A. Ross Institute,

    Colin A. Ross Institute, The C.I.A. Doctors,

    Colin A. Ross — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia,

    Logan Decker, “Hard Stuff: OCZ Neural Impulse Actuator,” PC Gamer Magazine, August 2008

    John Horgan, “The Forgotten Era of Brain Chips,” Scientific American (293, October 2005, pp. 66-73),

    José Manuel Rodriguez Delgado — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia,

    Project MKULTRA — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia,

    COINTELPRO — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia,

    “Is the U.S. Govt secretly testing a mind control weapon?,” Hoax Forum, Museum of Hoaxes,, 2/5/07

    Cheryl Welsh, “In Contravention of Conventional Wisdom: CIA ‘no touch’ torture makes sense out of mind control allegations,”, January 2008

    Paul Sajda, Columbia University,

    Thanks to Lucy Flanagan and Gregory Snook for their help with this article.

    ~~ Help Waking Times to raise the vibration by sharing this article with the buttons below…

    No, thanks!