CDC Forced to Release Proof They Knew Vaccine Preservative Causes Autism

CDC VaccinesChristina Sarich, Staff
Waking Times

Over 100 Freedom of Records Act (FOIA) requests have finally forced the euphemist US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to admit a widely used vaccine preservative is the equivalent of a neurological armageddon.

With help from PhD Scientist and Biochemist, Brian Hooker, the agency has finally had to reveal that they have known for years that thimerosal, which was banned in 1999, but still used in over 60 vaccines, causes autism. Robert F. Kennedy has been trying to alert the public of the same troublesome findings that Hooker has unveiled, but he is often dismissed, or worse, made into a media fool by the pharmaceutical industry.

Released in the documents are statements that indicate that the CDC has been sitting on information that would be of high value to those who have been for years investigating the link between vaccines and autism. As reported by Health Advice:

“When the results of the Verstraeten study were first reported outside the CDC in 2005, there was no evidence that anyone but Dr. Verstraeten within the CDC had known of the very high 7.6-fold elevated relative risk of autism from exposure to Thimerosal during infancy. But now, clear evidence exists. A newly-acquired abstract from 1999 titled, “Increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to Thimerosal containing vaccine in first month of life” required the approval of top CDC officials prior to its presentation at the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) conference. Thimerosal, which is 50% mercury by weight, was used in most childhood vaccines and in the RhoGAM shot for pregnant women prior to the early 2000s.The CDC maintains there is “no relationship between Thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism rates in children,” even though the data from the CDC’s own Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) database shows a very high risk. There are a number of public records to back this up, including this Congressional Record from May 1, 2003. The CDC’s refusal to acknowledge thimerosal’s risks is exemplified by a leaked statement from Dr. Marie McCormick, chair of the CDC/NIH-sponsored Immunization Safety Review at IOM. Regarding vaccination, she said in 2001, “…we are not ever going to come down that it [autism] is a true side effect…” Also of note, the former director of the CDC, which purchases $4 billion worth of vaccines annually, is now president of Merck’s vaccine division.” [Source]

What is Thimerosal and Why Should I Care?

Thimerosal is a mercury-based vaccine adjuvant (preservative) that causes a number of brain-injuring problems, with autism among them. Thimerosal is also a human carcinogen, mutagen, and teratogen that also interrupts the immune system and interrupts proper fetal development.

Thimerosal, is metabolized into toxic, and highly dangerous methylmercury. From there, the methylmercury is converted into the even more harmful, persistent, inorganic mercury that is retained in our physical tissues to wreck havoc on our health. For the immune-sensitive, this is the equivalent of a one-two punch. That must be why the World Health Organization (WHO) thinks thimerosal is ‘safe.’ It follows right along with their covert agenda to thin the herd.

READ: The UN’s Plan to Halt Population Growth by Turning Nature Against Us

There is no safe level of exposure to this neurotoxin, yet it is still used widely by Merck, Eli Lilly, and numerous other pharmaceutical companies. It is also still used in almost every flu vaccine currently administered.

According to Hooker, hundreds of thousands of babies born between 1991 and 1997, had their vaccine files analyzed by CDC epidemiologist Thomas Verstraeten, MD. Hooker says that this, “proves unequivocally that during 2000, CDC officers were knowledgeable internally of the very high hazard of autism, non-natural sleep problem and speech disorder associated with Thimerosal exposure.”

CDC as a Murderous Agency

These alarming facts, along with the testimony of whistleblowers like Kennedy expose the CDC as a dangerous, even murderous, government agency that cannot be trusted. They have lied to scientific bodies, fixed data, and withheld important information that could have prevented any number of autism cases, among other health dangers. With over 22 different medical cases that prove vaccines can cause autism, and the latest documentation from Hooker that reveals what the CDC has withheld, why would anyone trust this agency as a protector of public health?

Hope for the Future

Dr. Hooker’s is adamant about what must happen going forward: “We have to make certain that this and different proof of CDC malfeasance are supplied to Congress and the general public as quick as viable. Time is of the essence. Kid’s futures are at stake.” It will take vigilance with propaganda being slung from every direction.

Read more articles by Christina Sarich.

About the Author

Christina Sarich is a staff writer for Waking Times. She is a writer, musician, yogi, and humanitarian with an expansive repertoire. Her thousands of articles can be found all over the Internet, and her insights also appear in magazines as diverse as Weston A. Price, NexusAtlantis Rising, and the Cuyamungue Institute, among others. She was recently a featured author in the Journal, “Wise Traditions in Food, Farming, and Healing Arts,” and her commentary on healing, ascension, and human potential inform a large body of the alternative news lexicon. She has been invited to appear on numerous radio shows, including Health Conspiracy Radio, Dr. Gregory Smith’s Show, and dozens more. The second edition of her book, Pharma Sutra, will be released soon.

Like Waking Times on Facebook. Follow Waking Times on Twitter.

This article (CDC Forced to Release Proof They Knew Vaccine Preservative Causes Autism) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Christina Sarich and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

~~ Help Waking Times to raise the vibration by sharing this article with friends and family…

  • Bryan

    whenever somebody cites “SNOPES” (a fat lady, her geeky husband, and their cat) not some multinational team of independent researchers :D….

    I know at least 1 of 2 things.

    1) you have no idea what you’re talking about.

    2) there’s a strong notion you’re intentionally attempting to mislead the public…especially on controversial issues like Vaccines ;)….

  • Bryan

    whenever somebody cites “SNOPES” (a fat lady, her geeky husband, and their cat) not some multinational team of independent researchers :D….

    I know at least 1 of 2 things.

    1) you have no idea what you’re talking about.

    2) there’s a strong notion you’re intentionally attempting to mislead the public…especially on controversial issues like Vaccines 😉

  • Get_over_yourself

    Why are the references over a decade old? It is hard to know anymore what is NEW News and what is some journalist trying to dig up something to write about to get everyone stoked. This is important to me as I have a 5 year old granddaughter on the spectrum.

  • George McGnarly

    The info is over ten years old. You can go to snopes. They debunked it.

    • Get_over_yourself

      Thank you – I hadnt gone the snopes route yet but was wondering WHY all of the references were over a decade old yet this is a new article.

  • George McGnarly

    Is there any reasonable citation to this article?

    • Bryan

      they give you the exact name of the study, the person who did the study and the results of the study. The fact they didn’t provide a “link” to the study in question is irrelevant! Are people really this ignorant and lazy in 2016?

      • George McGnarly

        That’s not proper citation not to mention their reference is over ten years old.

  • Chris Sky

    quoting the CDC to “prove” no link is ridiuclous! you realizes the “CDC” a “government agency” gets the MAJORITY of it’s funding (and marching orders) from the “CDC Foundation” which is a PRIVATE CORPORATION UNREALTED TO THE CDC….. and guess who makes up the “Board of members” of the “CDC FOUNDATION”… i’ll list a few: MERCK, NOVARTIS, GSK,

    so now you’re telling me that an “agency” which is funded and controlled by the Vaccine Manufacturers is a “realiable” source” to “prove” the product they are being PAID TO PROMOTE is “safe and effective”…. no conflict of interest there 😀

    not to mention… where are all the Autisitc Adults in the USA? 1 in 65 children more almost 1.5% of the ENTIRE POPULATION is now “autistic”…. but this disease simply didn’t exist 30 years ago… fast foward to TRIPLING the “recommended vaccines” and Autism is now an epidemic… with HUNDREDS of papers showing the “link” just not “sponored” by the CDC.

    it’s called “cognitive dissonance” or straight up DENIAL.

  • Chris Sky

    the second link you referenced is mentioned by name and explained in the article!!!!!!!

    • Pop_Korn

      Have you ever wondered how people get DISQUS accounts like Elisa. Notice there is no Icon/aviator. The name Elisa is gray and you can’t click on it. These people aways seem to side against truth. They either take the governments position and become propagandists or take weird positions (like planet X etc. Renegade Profit/TheAdmonisher ) in and effort to poison the truth well.

      • Chris Sky

        of course…. you get 5 variety of trolls online
        1) most common… Hasbara Zionist army

        2) Big Pharma vaccines shills

        3) Anti gun/proLGBT/annti free speech/pro illegal immigration

        4) Clinton’s own “presidential race army”

        you see examples of these every single day…

  • geo1671

    What is missing in all of this—G.W.Bush admin passed a law that vaccine companies can not be sued. Just imagine if car companies have that same protection?
    Last night here in Toronto airport hotel district–thousands of mainly white kids streaming for a conference for Star Wars–dressed like idiots, red haired and thrashing fake swords. There is a big problem with vaccines :^(

  • fuster

    sarich has no credentials in science, little comprehension of it and is as sloppy a researcher as an average high schooler.

    this is another stupid, sloppy and worthless report from that dipstick

  • Padraigin Eagle

    Missing Links: Eish, 30 percenters abound.

    Only counter when you have an argument, Aikido 101; but then mastery be a thought beyond ye, clearly.

  • Eric Johnson

    Yup Page 11

    Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting. Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine.2

  • AnotherLover

    So Brian Hooker has documents. What documents?

  • Elisa

    Where is the proof they knew, they don’t reference any emails, documents, studies…nothing. I realize that they DID know, but stating the CDC was forced to release proof and then not show this proof is annoying to say the very least.

    • Chris Sky

      Maybe you should actually READ the article

      they reference a 2005 study: “When the results of the Verstraeten study were first reported outside the CDC in 2005, there was no evidence that anyone but Dr. Verstraeten within the CDC had known of the very high 7.6-fold elevated relative risk of autism from exposure to Thimerosal during infancy.”

      then they reference a 1999 study titled: ““Increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to Thimerosal containing vaccine in first month of life”

      then just to “drive it home” and let you know WHY this information is suppressed they give you this info:

      “Also of note, the former director of the CDC, which purchases $4 billion worth of vaccines annually, is now president of Merck’s vaccine division.”

      but i guess if you dont’ actually read the article you can come to the ridiculous conclusion “there is no emails, documents, studies” referenced. 😀

      • George McGnarly

        The article lacks citation. As a journalist I must satisfy the reference requirements within the article. Your snippet from the article doesn’t change anything in references.

        • Chris Sky

          they give you the exact name of the study, the person who did the study and the results of the study. The fact they didn’t provide a “link” to the study in question is irrelevant! Are people really this ignorant and lazy in 2016?

          • George McGnarly

            I looked into it. It’s a new article but the info is 10 years old. I found all the info on Snopes and they say the info is inaccurate and the article is false.

          • Chris Sky

            whenever somebody sites “SNOPES” (a fat lady, her geeky husband, and their cat) not some multinational team of independent researchers :D….

            I know at least 1 of 2 things.

            1) you have no idea what you’re talking about.

            2) there’s a strong notion you’re intentionally attempting to mislead the public…especially on controversial issues like Vaccines 😉

          • George McGnarly

            How old are you?

          • Chris Sky

            I’m 33, married, and the vp of a rather large corporation. I don’t know what any of that has to do with SNOPES STILL being a fat lady, her geeky husband, and their cat, “dispelling rumors” that are “inconvenient” for the ruling class.

            I would love for you to quote the EXACT section of SNOPES and cite the source that “Debunks” this evidence.

            but I’m sure all you have is more mis direction, deflection and straw man arguments….

            a better question from me to you is

            “How ignorant do you think people are?”

      • Get_over_yourself

        Again a 2005 study – this is 2016. I dont want to take up for anyone but I do want to know the truth – not supposition not conspiracy theory. There have been equal studies that say differently.

Thank you for sharing. Follow us for the latest updates.

Send this to friend