By September 24, 2015 5 Comments Read More →

How the Government Suppresses Free Energy Technologies

Top Secret National Archives-2Buck Rogers, Staff Writer
Waking Times

Have you ever wondered what the world would be like if better and cleaner energy sources were widely available and affordable to all of earth’s people? If so, you’re not alone, as the quest for a better energy existence has been the focus of many ingenious inventors, scientists, experimenters and even corporate and government scientists for generations.

We know it’s possible, but for some reason, though, society just can’t seem to get beyond 23.6 or so miles per gallon on average, highway. The gap between what science is clearly capable of and what is available to the consumer mass market is extraordinary, and here really is no need to be using up the world’s fossil fuels at building nuclear plants as if there were no tomorrow, but we do.

The truth is there for those whom have eyes to see. Tremendous market forces and capital involved in government and in the energy and automobile industries make it practically impossible for any promising energy device or technology patent to emerge as a viable and accessible alternative in the real marketplace, and not just appearing on YouTube or at trade shows as prototypes. Alternatives do exist, but why are they not more broadly available?

In addition to the more famous cases such as Wilhelm Reich, and other scientific geniuses like Nikola Tesla, Raymond Rife, or Linus Pauling, many lesser known inventors have patented or attempted to patent functional energy devices that just never seem to make it to the public.

How exactly are advanced energy technologies and energy devices actually suppressed? One could argue that the suppression of energy technologies is a necessary evil by government, as Gary Vesperson has here:

“An understandable reason for suppressing certain types of energy inventions is that the knowledge behind them is also capable of producing tremendously destructive advanced electromagnetic weapons such as the “death ray” apparently invented by Nikola Tesla. Hence many such new energy technologies, particularly those using this kind of knowledge of advanced electromagnetic principles, are considered “dual use” technologies that are among the 4,000 un-numbered patent applications confiscated in a vault at the US Patent and Trademark Office because of their military potential and the need to keep that knowledge from America’s enemies.” [Gary Vesperson]

Some cases, perhaps, may surely be considered national security, but in today’s age, the public is discouraged from even looking into simple alternatives, and even the electric car was originally killed.

Nikola-Tesla-1

The works of Nikola Tesla were suppressed by the government and industry.

Who knows precisely how many opportunities the human race has lost to see free energy?

The Orion Project, an organization dedicated to the transformation of our energy usage took a close look at why this is the case, and exactly how the goevernment suppresses free energy decvices. In their review of past and now obscure technologies, they’ve noted the key ways in which alternative energy technologies are suppressed. Take a look:

Our review of past and now-obscure technological breakthroughs shows that these inventions have been suppressed or seized by the following broad categories of actions:

1.5.1 Acquisition of the technology by ‘front’ companies whose intent has been to ‘shelve’ the invention and prevent the device from coming to market.

1.5.2 Denial of patents and intellectual property protection by systematic action by the US and other patent offices.

1.5.3 Seizure or suppression of the technology by the illegal application of section 181 of the US Patent law or other illegal applications of national security provisions that result in the technology being classified or deemed “of significance to the national security”. Note that these applications are illegal actions taken by rogue, unsupervised individuals and entities who are working in collusion with interests to suppress these technologies.

1.5.4 Abuses by other regulatory or licensing entities, including but not limited to rogue elements within the Department of Defense, CIA, NSA, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Energy and others.

1.5.5 Targeting the inventor or company with financial scams, illegal financial arrangements that lead to the demise of the company, and similar traps.

1.5.6 Systematic interception of funds and essential financial support needed to develop and commercialize such fundamental new energy sources. Summary of Breakthrough Energy Technologies, 10/19/09 p. 6

1.5.7 A pattern of harassment, bomb threats, theft and other shadowy actions that frighten, intimidate and demoralize those inventing, holding or developing such technologies; significant bodily harm and murder have also apparently occurred.

1.5.8 Inducements through significant financial buyouts, offers of positions of power and prestige and other benefits to the owner of such technologies to secure their cooperation in suppressing such technologies.

1.5.9 Scientific establishment prejudice and rejection of the technology in light of unconventional electromagnetic effects thought to be not possible by current scientific conventional wisdom.

1.5.10 Corruption of scientific entities and leaders through clandestine liaisons with rogue classified or shadowy private projects that intend to suppress such devices.

1.5.11 Corruption of major media entities and key figures through clandestine liaisons with rogue classified or private shadowy projects that intend to suppress such devices. [Source]

As you can see, its full spectrum dominance when it comes to the suppression of energy technologies. What will it take to see a significant cultural shift toward sustainable energy technologies? One has to wonder if the suppression of such important things as free and overunity energy is even possible by humans. What do you think?

Read more articles from Buck Rogers.

About the Author

Buck Rogers is the earth bound incarnation of that familiar part of our timeless cosmic selves, the rebel within. He is a surfer of ideals and meditates often on the promise of happiness in a world battered by the angry seas of human thoughtlessness. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com.

Like Waking Times on Facebook. Follow Waking Times on Twitter.

This article (How the Government Suppresses Free Energy Technologies) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Buck Rogers and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

~~ Help Waking Times to raise the vibration by sharing this article with friends and family…


  • Michael Waters

    Nice article. Small correction:

    “The truth is there for those whom have eyes to see.” In my opinion, it should be “who,” not “whom.”

    Keep up the good work!

  • DCW16

    “the electric car was originally killed.” ? ? ?
    The original Electric Car died when Cadillac invented the Self Starter . . .
    You are obviously are referring to the Mikey Moore movie . . . GM leased those cars, they were far too expensive to market, and the market was extremely limited.
    Today, Tesla and others run on Govt Subsidies . . . Billions of Tax Dollars . . . they use copious amounts of Rare Earths mined mostly in China.
    The most environmentally friendly car . . . is the car you have, no one has to Make It !

    Some day “dilithyium crystals” will be invented . . . but in the mean time we have over a hundred years of fossil fuels, which enable us to live comfortably as our life expectancy increases in one of the cleanest countries on the planet.

  • sorgfelt

    It makes no sense to try to file for a patent on any device relating to free energy or anti-gravity, yet people persist in doing it. Why? Greed? Naivity? Stupidity? If you have made such a device, just spread it in such a way that it can’t be easily taken away from public view. If I had made a free energy device, I would simply package and sell it as a long-lasting battery at a reasonable price for such. It could get spread far and wide before someone wised up and looked inside it, after noticing that it never wore out. The next thing would be to put the idea in print and the Internet and spread it far and wide. Would I be losing my chance to make it rich? Maybe, but the benefits would far outweigh any loss of riches.

  • BrianFraser

    New scientific insights can lead to truly wondrous innovations. But there is a dark side too. Weaponization of gravity has some truly terrifying implications.

    Readers might be interested in my article “Beyond Einstein: non-local physics” The free 22 page paper is available at:

    http://scripturalphysics.org/4v4a/BeyondEinstein.html
    which gives a link to the .pdf file

    Some statements in that article show its relevance::

    “Example: there are two kinds of position and two kinds of velocity. Remember those two terms in the non-local form of gamma? We are using only one of them for propulsion—the spatial velocity one that depends on Newtonian mechanics. The other possibility, that of non-local motion, has been left unexplored. Using that, an aircraft could move from one position in the sky to another without traversing the intervening space. It would appear at one location, then disappear, then re-appear at another location. It could move at extremely high speeds without generating a sonic boom. It would use “field propulsion” based on the non-local characteristics of electric and magnetic fields. It would be completely self-contained because there is no action/reaction (exhaust) as in conventional propulsion (in this case, the reaction forces are radial, and cancel out within the structure of the aircraft, making the preferred shape one of something with radial symmetry, like a saucer or cigar).”

    And this one:

    “Control of gravity and control of locality, would give us the ability to travel to the stars without traversing the intervening space. It would give us new forms of energy, and new ways of shaping our world, as well as many other astonishing things.”

  • Dimitri Dontspamme

    Free energy technology sure wasn’t suppressed on 9/11. Hey ma, look, no hands!

Thank you for sharing. Follow us for the latest updates.