The Magic Duo for Cancer Treatment That Frightens The FDA and Conventional Medicine

WIKI - Cancer CellsDave Mihalovic, Prevent Disease
Waking Times

Use of DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide) in medicine dates back decades. It was predominantly used as a topical anagesic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant. Today, we know that DMSO can treat a variety of disorders including arthritis, mental illness, emphysema, and even cancerWhile this is now considered a superb cancer treatment, orthodox medicine is not interested in discussing its benefits. If DMSO were to be implemented and used in cancer treatment, the “true cure rate” for orthodox medicine would rise from 3% to above 90%! Here’s why.

Supporters of DMSO have long supported the claim that it can cause cancerous cells to become noncancerous, or benign, and can slow or stop the progress of cancer in the bladder, colon, ovary, breast, and skin. Some evidence even suggest it is useful in treating leukemia, and it has also been used as a part of some metabolic cancer therapies.

DMSO was first discovered in the mid- to late nineteenth century. In the 1950s, it was discovered that DMSO could protect cells from the damage of freezing. In the 1960s, Dr. Stanley Jacob, one of the main proponents of DMSO, began to study other medicinal properties of the substance. In the 1970s, DMSO was approved for use as an anti-inflammatory treatment in dogs and horses and as a prescription drug for a type of bladder inflammation in humans.

If orthodox medicine were truly interested in curing cancer, don’t you think they would look for a way to target cancer cells with the intent of killing them while sparing normal cells?

Chemotherapy does not target cancer cells, and because of this, chemotherapy:
1) Kills far more normal cells than cancer cells, and
2) Damages and toxifies many of the normal cells that do survive.

If a “magic bullet” were used FIRST by orthodox medicine, meaning thecut/burn/slash/poison treatments were avoided, a 90% true cure rate would be easy to achieve. But the fact of the matter is that the leaders in the medical community have absolutely no interest in finding a “magic bullet.” A “magic bullet” would cost the drug companies hundreds of billions of dollars, patients would have less hospitalization, less doctor visits, etc. The fact is, no one wants a “magic bullet” to be found. The evidence that this is true is that two “magic bullets” are already known to exist, but no one is using them except for a handful of doctors.

What Causes Cancer?

Most people believe that it is DNA damage that causes cancer. While in rare situations, DNA can have a negative affect on a person’s immune system, DNA normally has absolutely nothing to do with the development of cancer.

The fact is that cancer is caused by a special type of microbe which gets inside of normal cells and turns the cells cancerous.

Cancer is an invading disease that attacks the body’s immune system. Once detected, cancer has already had enough time to establish its web network. Treating the tumor is not good enough–it is only the start.

Actually, everyone has cancer cells forming in their body at all times. The immune system generally safely kills them. However, this means that a weakened immune system, and many other things, can allow cancer cells to overcome the immune system. But the actual formation of cancer cells is exclusively caused by microbes which get inside of normal cells.

Dr. Royal Rife did an enormous amount of research into the relationship between microbes and cancer in the 1930s. He would inject mice with a virus and in 100% of the cases the mice would get cancer.

Dr. Rife proposed a cure for cancer which did nothing but kill the viruses/microbes which were inside of the cancer cells. His cure was 100% successful. However, note that his cure had no intention of killing cancer cells or fixing DNA (which had not been discovered in the 1930s); its only goal was to kill microbes which were both inside and outside of the cancer cells. Once the microbes were dead the cancer cells were able to revert back into normal, differentiated cells.

Dr. Rife was well aware that the critial microbes which needed to be killed were inside the cancer cells. The electromedicine device he used killed microbes inside and outside of cancer cells.

But almost all natural substances do not normally get inside of cells, thus it is almost impossible for natural substances to kill the microbes inside the cancer cells. Natural substances can kill cancer cells and build the immune system, but they generally cannot kill microbes inside the cancer cells.

There is no single cure for treating cancer; cancer must be approached and treated holistically. The cellular process in developing cancer takes many years–with the exception of high radiation or other toxic exposure, a compromised immunity and cell damage does not happen overnight. Treatment must be approached defensively and directly; focus on the cause and do not treat cancer in reverse. Target your treatment mentally and physically from the very origin.


You might ask your oncologist why your chances of survival are only 3% (ignoring all of their statistical gibberish such as “5-year survival rates” and deceptive terms like “remission” and “response”), when your chance of survival would be over 90% if they used DMSO.

It would be better for medical doctors to treat cancer patients with the right treatment than to have patients treat themselves at home. Medical doctors can diagnose better, treat better, watch for developing problems better, etc. Unfortunately, doctors are using treatments that have been chosen solely on the basis of their profitability rather than their effectiveness.

DMSO is a highly non-toxic, 100% natural product that comes from the wood industry. But of course, like so many other potential cancer cures, the discovery was buried. DMSO, being a natural product, cannot be patented and cannot be made profitable because it is produced by the tonin the wood industry. The only side-effect of using DMSO in humans is body odor (which varies from patient to patient).

The FDA took note of the effectiveness of DMSO at treating pain and made it illegal for medical uses in order to protect the profits of the aspirin companies (in those days aspirin was used to treat arthritis). Thus, it must be sold today as a “solvent.” Few people can grasp the concept that government agencies are organized for the sole purpose of being the “police force” of large, corrupt corporations.

While it is generally believed that orthodox medicine and modern corrupt politicians persecute alternative medicine, this is not technically correct. What they do is persecute ANY cure for cancer, it doesn’t matter whether it is orthodox or alternative. The proof of this is DMSO. It appears that orthodox medicine persecutes alternative medicine only because there are far more alternative cancer treatments that can cure cancer than orthodox treatments.

Another substance that targets cancer cells is being researched at Purdue University and other places: folic acid. This too will be buried unless it can lead to more profitable cancer treatments.

But alternative medicine is rightfully not interested in combining DMSO with chemotherapy. DMSO will combine with many substances, grab them, and drag them into cancer cells. It will also blast through the blood-brain barrier like it wasn’t even there.

DMSO has been combined successfully with hydrogen peroxide (e.g. see Donsbach), cesium chloride, MSM (though it may not bind to MSM), and other products.

DMSO – Vitamin C Treatment

Vitamin C is so simlar to glucose, that cells, and especially cancer cells, consume vitamin C the same way they would consume glucose.

Cancer cells are anaerobic obligates, which means they depend upon glucose as their primary source of metabolic fuel. Cancer cells employ transport mechanisms called glucose transporters to actively pull in glucose.

In the vast majority of animals, vitamin C is synthesized from glucose in only four metabolic steps. Hence, the molecular shape of vitamin C is remarkably similar to glucose. Cancer cells will actively transport vitamin C into themselves, possibly because they mistake it for glucose. Another plausible explanation is that they are using the vitamin C as an antioxidant. Regardless, the vitamin C accumulates in cancer cells.

If large amounts of vitamin C are presented to cancer cells, large amounts will be absorbed. In these unusually large concentrations, the antioxidant vitamin C will start behaving as a pro-oxidant as it interacts with intracellular copper and iron. This chemical interaction produces small amounts of hydrogen peroxide.

Because cancer cells are relatively low in an intracellular anti-oxidant enzyme called catalase, the high dose vitamin C induction of peroxide will continue to build up until it eventually lyses the cancer cell from the inside out! This effectively makes high dose IVC a non-toxic chemotherapeutic agent that can be given in conjunction with conventional cancer treatments. Based on the work of several vitamin C pioneers before him, Dr. Riordan was able to prove that vitamin C was selectively toxic to cancer cells if given intravenously. This research was recently reproduced and published by Dr. Mark Levine at the National Institutes of Health.

As feared by many oncologists, small doses may actually help the cancer cells because small amounts of vitamin C may help the cancer cells arm themselves against the free-radical induced damage caused by chemotherapy and radiation. Only markedly higher doses of vitamin C willselectively build up as peroxide in the cancer cells to the point of acting in a manner similar to chemotherapy. These tumor-toxic dosages can only be obtained by intravenous administration.

Over a span of 15 years of vitamin C research, Dr. Riordan’s RECNAC (cancer spelled backwards) research team generated 20 published papers on vitamin C and cancer. RECNAC even inspired its second cancer research institute, known as RECNAC II, at the University of Puerto Rico. This group recently published an excellent paper in Integrative Cancer Therapies, titled “Orthomolecular Oncology Review: Ascorbic Acid and Cancer 25 Years Later.” RECNAC data has shown that vitamin C is toxic to tumor cells without sacrificing the performance of chemotherapy.

Intravenous vitamin C also does more than just kill cancer cells. It boosts immunity. It can stimulate collagen formation to help the body wall off the tumor. It inhibits hyaluronidase, an enzyme that tumors use to metastasize and invade other organs throughout the body. It induces apoptosis to help program cancer cells into dying early. It corrects the almost universal scurvy in cancer patients. Cancer patients are tired, listless, bruise easily, and have a poor appetite. They don’t sleep well and have a low threshold for pain. This adds up to a very classic picture of scurvy that generally goes unrecognized by their conventional physicians.

Because cancer cells consume 15 times more glucose than normal cells, under the right conditions, cancer cells should consume 15 times more vitamin C than a normal cell. While normal cells benefit from vitamin C, the microbes inside of the cancer cells may be killed by vitamin C. It is microbes which are inside of the cancer cells which cause cancer and which force a cancer cell to remain cancerous.

It should be mentioned that two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling, and an associate, Dr. Ewan Cameron, M.D., were able to extend the lives of cancer patients more than 10-fold using only 10 grams of vitamin C a day by I.V.

This protocol will modify the Pauling/Cameron protocol four different ways:
1) It will include DMSO in the evening dose to help Vitamin C target cancer cells and get inside of cancer cells,
2) It includes a very, very low glucose diet so that the cancer cells will feast on Vitamin C instead of glucose,
3) It includes 15% or less potassium ascorbate, which has a special affinity for cancer cells,
4) It will include as little sodium ascorbate (or other sodium forms of Vitamin C) as possible because these types of Vitamin C do not get inside of cancer cells very well.

Regarding the use of potassium ascorbate, a foundation in Italy has proven that potassium ascorbate can be used to cure cancer (WARNING:no more than 15% of the Vitmain C you take should be a potassium version!!). See: Pantellini Foundation (Italy)

WARNING: Do NOT use potassium ascorbate or any other form of potassium as your primary source of Vitamin C!!! If you use potassium ascorbate work with the vendor of this product to insure you are taking safe doses relative to non-potassium forms of Vitamin C!!! If your vendor does not make a recommendation, then use 15% as the maximum portion of Vitamin C that is a potassium form!!

The second thing this treatment uses is DMSO. DMSO is used to “open” the ports on the cancer cells to assist getting vitamin C inside the cancer cells. DMSO is very well known to target cancer cells and open their ports. To better understand this concept see this article.
In summary, there are three things that help get the vitamin C inside the cancer cells:
1) Cancer cells consume 15 times more glucose than normal cells and cancer cells cannot tell the difference between glucose and vitamin C.
2) The use of potassium ascorbate as a part of the Vitamin C protocol.
3) The use of DMSO.
A fourth unique thing about this protocol is the “cancer diet.” The cancer diet for this treatment focuses on a LOW GLUCOSE cancer diet. In this way, the cancer cells have less glucose to interfere with their consumption of vitamin C!

Possible Swelling and Inflammation

There are two possible results when large amounts of vitamin C get inside of a cancer cell. First, the vitamin C can kill the microbe(s) inside the cancer cell and the cell will safely revert into a normal cell; or second, the vitamin C can kill the cancer cell itself.

While the first of these two options will not cause any swelling or inflammation, the second option may cause swelling and inflammation.

For this reason, anyone on this protocol who would be put at risk by swelling and/or inflammation (e.g. in a tumor), should carefully and slowly build-up to the theraputic dose of vitamin C, watching carefully for any potential swelling or inflammation.

Details of the Treatment

Many people have difficulties working with DMSO. In some cases, when taken transdermally (through the skin) there is a skin rash which is simply too severe to continue the treatment. When you get your bottle of DMSO put one drop on your skin, spread it around a little bit and see if you have an allergic reaction (i.e. severe rash). If not, an hour later put 10 drops on your skin and spread it thin.

If you do have a reaction, you may still be able to take the DMSO orally (added to 4 ounces of water). But if you cannot take the DMSO orally, and you have a skin reaction to the DMSO, you will have to abandon this treatment.

If you want to know more about DMSO, see this website:

The Importance of the DMSO

This treatment uses DMSO (in the evening) and vitamin C (twice a day). The theory of this treatment is that the DMSO will be used first (in the evening dose), either taken orally (with water) or transdermally (through the skin). In about 10 minutes the DMSO will have targeted the cancer cells and will start “opening up” their ports.

In the evening dose, about ten minutes after taking the DMSO, the vitamin C will be taken with water. When the vitamin C gets to the cancer cells the cells natural affinity for consuming vitamin C (because the cancer cells “think” the vitamin C is glucose) should be enhanced by the fact that the cancer cells have been “opened up” by DMSO.

The theory is that the DMSO will allow a larger concentration of vitamin C to get inside the cancer cells than would normally occur.

As already mentioned, once vitamin C can get inside of a cancer cell the cell may revert into a normal cell or it may be killed. If enough cancer cells are killed, some swelling may occur.

The Vitamin C To Be Used **VERY Important**

There are several different types of vitamin C. The most common type of vitmain C is ascorbic acid, which is not bound to a mineral. This type of vitamin C is largely useless until it has bound to minerals already in the body.
The ideal vitamin C product will have both ascorbic acid, no more than 15% potassium ascorbate or potassium carbonate and other forms of mineral ascorbates or carbonates or other forms of Vitamin C.

Since sodium is generally found outside of cells and potassium is generally found inside of cells, to get vitamin C inside of cells it is best to use a potassium ascorbate. However, for safety reasons, most of the Vitamin C cannot be a potassium version of Vitamin C (talk to your vendor). If you can avoid sodium ascorbate and use some other non-potassium form of Vitamin C (e.g. ascorbic acid) use it.

Some buffered vitamin C products have ascorbic acid and several different kinds of mineral ascorbates or carbonates (e.g. zinc carbonate). This is good, but it may be necessary to add some potassium ascorbate to get the percentage of potassium up to 15% (or whatever maximum your potassium vendor tells you). Include as little sodium ascorbate as possible.

The DMSO and Vitamin C Protocol

This treatment will be taken twice a day.

The morning dose will only include Vitamin C. Remember to take VERY LITTLE glucose during this treatment!!

The evening treatment will include two phases.

In the evening, Phase One will be 1 TEAspoon of DMSO, taken orally or transdermally or some combination thereof.

Phase Two of the evening dose should follow Phase One by 10 minutes and will consist of 5 grams of vitamin C taken orally in water.

The Morning Dose – Vitamin C Only

The morning dose, which should be taken about twelve hours before the evening dose, should contain 5 grams of vitamin C. Fifteen percent or less (or whatever your potassium vendor tells you) should be a form of potassium carbonate (or some other potassium version of Vitamin C). The other eighty-five percent should contain zero potassium Vitamin C and as little sodium Vitamin C as possible.

The Evening Dose (DMSO and Vitamin C): Phase One: Taking the DMSO

The DMSO used in this protocol should be at least 99% pure DMSO mixed with 30% water. In other words, you should buy “70/30” DMSO, which means 70% pure DMSO and 30% water. Some DMSO vendors sellDMSO Gel or DMSO Liquid.

The amount of DMSO taken during this treatment is so low that normally it can be taken orally if it is mixed with 4 ounces of water. However, if for any reason the DMSO cannot be taken orally it can be spread over the skin (such as the arms, legs or stomach) and taken transdermally (through the skin).

The DMSO should be put in a glass of water before taking it orally. The glass of water should have at least 4 ounces of water in it!

The Evening Dose:

1a DMSO Orally) If you are taking the DMSO orally, put 4 ounces of a quality bottled water in a glass. Then put ONE TEAspoon of DMSO in the water. Drink the water (and thus the DMSO).

Because the DMSO may cause stomach irritation, you may want to build up to the theraputic dose of DMSO. For example, you might use the following build-up:
Day 1 – Evening) Use 1/4 TEAspoon of DMSO in 4 ounces of water,
Day 2 – Evening) Use 1/2 TEAspoon of DMSO in 4 ounces of water,
Day 3 – Evening) Use 3/4 TEAspoon of DMSO in 4 ounces of water,
Day 4 – Evening) Use 1 TEAspoon of DMSO in 4 ounces of water,
Day 5 – Evening) Continue using the 1 TEAspoon of DMSO in 4 ounces of water.

1b – DMSO Transdermally) If you are taking the DMSO transdermally (through the skin), put ONE TEAspoon of DMSO on your arms, legs or stomach (as close to the cancer as possible). Spread the DMSO very thin (i.e. over a wide area of skin). Ten minutes after spreading the DMSO on the skin, and AFTER the DMSO has penetrated the skin (and the skin is dry), you can put a skin cream on where you rubbed the DMSO to prevent a rash.

The Evening Dose: Phase Two: Taking the Vitamin C

The evening dose, which should be taken about ten minutes after taking the DMSO, should contain 5 grams of vitamin C. Fifteen percent or less (or whatever your potassium vendor tells you) should be a form of potassium carbonate (or some other potassium version of Vitamin C). The other eighty-five percent should contain no potassium Vitamin C and as little sodium Vitamin C as possible. (Of course, the vitamin C may be pre-mixed).

Here is one highly recommended potassium vitamin C vendor (Fifteen percent or LESS of the Vitamin C should be a potassium version unless your vendor of potassium ascorbate tells you differently):
Excellent Buffered Vitamin C Product

One rounded teaspoon contains 4 grams of absorbic acid and 700 mg of potassium ascorbate. It also has zero mg of sodium (which is ideal). The ideal product will have potassium ascorbate without sodium ascorbate, but with other forms of Vitamin C.

As with all vitamin C products, keep this product out of the reach of children! It can be very dangerous if very high doses are taken.

If you have a type of cancer which could lead to a dangerous situation if swelling and inflammation resulted from this treatment, SLOWLY build up the dose of Vitamin C.

For example, you might use the following build-up (for both morning and evening):
Day 1) Use 1/4 TEAspoon of vitamin C, in 6 ounces of water
Day 2) Use 1/2 TEAspoon of vitamin C, in 6 ounces of water
Day 3) Use 3/4 TEAspoon of vitamin C, in 6 ounces of water
Day 4) Use 1 level TEAspoon of vitamin C, in 6 ounces of water
Day 5) Start the full treatment at full doses

If you experience any potentially dangerous swelling or inflammation during any of the days, DISCONTINUE THIS TREATMENT.

The Cancer Diet

Any time you use a protocol which is designed to kill microbes it is very, very critical to avoid eating foods and drinks which feed or excite the microbes. This includes cancer because cancer is a microbial disease.
An acidic diet of foods and drinks will make this protocol less effective because microbes will breed much faster and be more aggressive in the presence of an acidic diet. In other words, the microbes will breed faster than you can kill them!! This includes the microbes which are inside the cancer cells.

What this means is that without a solid “cancer diet” there is no way this cancer protocol, or any other cancer protocol, is going to be effective!! The “cancer diet” is also the number one way to stop the spreading of cancer!!

An alkaline diet includes, among other things:
1) ZERO sugar,
2) ZERO white flour,
3) ZERO soda pops (even diet soda pops are forbidden),
4) ZERO meat,
5) ZERO dairy products (except cottage cheese during the Budwig Diet)
After eliminating all the foods that feed or excite microbes, what is left over is basically whole foods, non-sugar fruit and vegetable drinks and other healthy foods and drinks.

Also, for this protocol, pay extra attention to avoiding anything with sugar, glucose, etc. in it (you do not have to worry about whole foods). 

Remember this is not only an alkaline diet but also a low-glucose diet.
See this article (you may need to modify this diet to avoid glucose not in whole foods): Cancer Diet article

Other Comments About the Protocol

Starting 45 minutes before taking either the morning or evening treatment, until 45 minutes after taking the vitamin C, you should not eat any foods or take any other supplements. The reason is that the DMSO will open-up the cancer cells and the vitamin C should have as little competition as possible to get inside the cancer cells.

In taking the evening treatment the DMSO is taken first, and the vitamin C is taken 10 minutes AFTER the DMSO is taken.

Thus, the MORNING schedule may look like this:
0800 – 5 grams of vitamin C mixed in 6 ounces of water (with 15% or less a potassium Vitamin C)

2000 (8 PM) – 1 TEAspoon of DMSO, mixed in 4 ounces of water
2010 (8:10 PM) – 5 grams of vitamin C in 6 or more ounces of water

NOTICE: The evening dose, because of the DMSO, will likely create severe body odor. One hour after taking the DMSO the person should take a shower and change clothes and underware. In the morning they should take another shower and change their underware again. For some people even these precautions will not be enough. Have trusted people (WHO HAVE NOT TAKEN DMSO) be the judge of how bad you smell after the two showers and two changes of clothes and underware.

How Long Should the Treatment Be Taken?

This treatment should be taken indefinitely. Every six weeks the patient should take the Navarro Urine testIf the Navarro Urine test number does not increase each time it is taken, continue with this treatment.

If the Navarro Urine test number increases, discontinue this treatment and use a more proven alternative cancer treatment, such as the Cellect-Budwig protocol or the Life One protocol of Dr. Howenstine.

Then, 6 or 8 weeks AFTER the treatment is finished, please take another Navarro urine test. Because the Navarro urine test measures the amount of HCG molecules in your body, even if the cancer is cured, and the cancer cells are removed, the score many not drop as much as it should because it can take several months for the body to flush HCG molecules out of the body, even after the cancer is cured.

What this means is that it is difficult, even using the Navarro, to measure the success of this treatment because there is no way to actually measure how many cancer cells there are in a patient’s body without using a PET scan or CT scan.

Contact The Independent Cancer Research Foundation (ICRF) for more information on this protocol, whether you have questions or comments or need to state a protocol, email support is provided.

About the Author

Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.


Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of WakingTimes or its staff.

~~ Help Waking Times to raise the vibration by sharing this article with the buttons below…

  • Joanne Springett

    I smoked for 20 years, October 2014 i was diagnosed of Emphysema my doctor told me there is no permanent cure for the disease, i was given bronchodilators to help me relax my bronchiolar muscles, I managed on with the disease till a friend told me about a herbal doctor from South Africa who sell herbal medicines to cure all kind of diseases including emphysema, I contacted this herbal doctor via his email and made purchase of the emphysema herbal medicine, i received the herbal medicine through DHL within 5 days, when i received the herbal medicine i applied it as prescribed and was totally cured of emphysema within 18-20 days of usage, the symptoms reduced till i even forgot i had emphysema, i went back to my doctor for diagnosis with spirometry and he confirmed i was free from the disease, contact this herbal doctor via his email drlusandaherbal(at)gmail(dot)com or website on www(dot)drlusandaherbal(dot)weebly(dot)com

  • Ruth Lucas


    I was diagnosed of hepatitis in 2012 and I have tried all possible means to get cure but all to no avail, until i saw a post in a health forum about a herbal doctor from South Africa who prepare herbal medicine to cure all kind of diseases including hepatitis b virus, at first i doubted if it was real but decided to give it a try, when i contact this herbal doctor via his email, he prepared a herbal medicine and sent it to me via courier service, when i received this herbal medicine, he gave me step by instructions on how to apply it, when i applied it as instructed, i was cured of this deadly virus within 18-20 days of usage, I am now free from the virus, i was tasted negative. Contact this great herbal doctor via his email Goodluck

  • Ruth Lucas

    hello My names are Kyrah Lucas ,everyone pls dont ignore this testimony ,my life was restored by a GOD gifted herbalist ,i was diagnosed with herpes HSV-2 for two years ,i was crying every night ,mr fred introduced me to DR Lusanda ,who cured him hepatitis b ,so he said the herbalist cures all kinds of STD, so contacted him via his email,,so he replied .i told him my problem ,he said i must not worry he will cure ,within 2weeks ,which he did ,wow am so happy to post this testimony ,DR Lusanda ,herbal medicine is the best ,he sent me the herbal medicine ,and told how to use it ,i was cured ,totally from the deadly disease within 2weeks of use ,,thanks to DR Lusanda ,,..PLS TRY N SEE FOR URSELF …

  • Felicia


    I was diagnosed of Emphysema in 2014, i was told the toxins in cigarette smoke caused the damage and it has no permanent cure but i was given medication to ease it, it affected me badly, my doctor suggested LVRS as i was constantly out of breath, this continued till i saw a post in a health forum about a herbal doctor from South Africa who prepare herbal medicines to cure all kind of diseases including Emphysema, i contacted this herbal doctor Dr Ejiro via his email and he sent me Emphysema herbal medicine via courier service, when i received this herbal medicine i applied it as instructed and was totally cured of Emphysema within 14 days of usage, i am totally free from emphysema now, contact Dr Ejiro via his email or call him on +27616158179

  • pat

    Today, we know that DMSO can treat a variety of disorders including arthritis, mental illness, emphysema

    Your article dealt solely with cancer, can you tell me about the claim that it also cures emphysema ?

    Any information you could offer would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you

  • Nick

    Quackery doesn’t worry me much, especially after seeing the crookery of the western medical establishment.

  • Social Justice

    DMSO is toxic to the central nervous system, especially in children. It doesn’t work on “microbes” (which statement shows the ignorance of the author); it works specifically on oxygenated free radicals.

    Any claim of efficacy of 90% is also crap, as we now know of at least three dozen different causal agents, which work in at least six different ways (none of which involves free radicals).

    More to the point, claims that scientists are ignoring any effective cure are flatly stupid. The scientist who shows positive results will be reach beyond dreams of avarice, instantly tenured wherever she/he may be, and otherwise set for life. Further debunking the claims of scientific conspiracy is very simple – google/bing NIH studies on DMSO. We’ve been studying it for a long time, with plenty of recent articles.

  • jimmy-goat

    Vitamin C/Ascorbic Acid/Ascorbate
    Linus Pauling Ph.D., won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1954 and for Peace in
    1962. Ewan Cameron, M.B., Ch.B., F.R.C.S. (Edinburgh and Glasgow), was Medical
    Director of the Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine.
    Linus Pauling stated in an interview in 1996:
    “I became interested in vitamin C and cancer in 1971 and began working with Ewan
    Cameron, M.B., Ch.B., chief surgeon at Vale of Leven Hospital in Scotland. Cameron
    gave 10 grams of vitamin C a day to patients with untreatable, terminal cancer. These
    patients were then compared by Cameron and me to patients with the same kind of
    cancer at the same terminal stage who were being treated in the same hospital but by
    other doctors–doctors who didn’t give vitamin C, but instead just gave conventional
    treatments. Cameron’s terminal cancer patients lived far longer compared to the ones
    who didn’t get 10 grams a day of vitamin C. The other patients lived an average of six
    months after they were pronounced terminal, while Cameron’s patients lived an average
    of about six years. ”
    Cameron and Pauling treated a large series of terminally ill cancer patients with massive
    doses of vitamin C.
    This ‘megadose’ vitamin therapy involves the ingestion of large amounts of vitamins. This
    treatment has been extensively evaluated at the Vale of Leven Hospital in Scotland under
    the supervision of Dr. Cameron. The experiments found that terminal cancer patients who
    received large, daily doses of vitamin C along with their regular treatment lived much
    longer than patients who did not receive vitamin C; they also had less pain and in general,
    a much improved quality of life. There were also some complete remissions.
    Vitamin C has many properties which makes it an excellent cancer fighter. It is a
    detoxifying agent, an antioxidant, and helps to produce antibodies. It is also very important
    in preventing growing tumors from invading adjacent tissue.
    Uncontrolled trials conducted at two different hospitals in Japan during the 1970s also
    confirmed the increase in survival time of terminal cancer patients supplemented with
    ascorbate. They found the best results with 30-60 grams daily. Highest increase in
    survival time was obtained with uterine cancer, and the smallest increases with lung and
    stomach cancer.
    They gave a later group of terminally ill patients a broad spectrum of other vitamins and
    minerals with their vitamin C. These patients had even larger increases in life expectancy.
    Results were best with cancers of the reproductive system.
    A Mayo Clinic study did not confirm the Cameron and Pauling results for Vitamin C, and
    each side accused the other of methodological errors.
    Dr. Hoffer of Victoria, Canada later expanded on the Pauling/Cameron treatment protocol
    by adding large amounts of vitamin E, vitamin B-3, other B vitamins, beta-carotene, and
    some minerals. Those of Dr. Hoffer’s cancer patients who followed this regimen lived, on
    the average, about 16 times longer than those who did not.
    In January 1994, Dr. Donald Lamm and his colleagues at the West Virginia University
    School of Medicine reported that daily megadose vitamin therapy significantly lessens the
    risk of recurrence in bladder cancer patients. Patients who received the therapy, on the
    average, had less than half the tumor recurrence rate than did patients who did not receive
    it. Dr. Lamm’s vitamin combination included multivitamins (RDA dosages) plus 40,000 IU
    vitamin A, 100 mg vitamin B-6, 2,000 mg vitamin C, 400 IU vitamin E, and 90 mg zinc(32).
    Vitamin C is involved in the maintenance of a healthy immune system as well as protecting
    against a variety of cancers. It has also been shown to demonstrate an inhibitory effect on
    tumor growth. It is found in citrus fruits, broccoli, green peppers, and many other fruits and
    There is solid evidence that this vitamin is essential for optimal functioning of the immune
    system. Natural killer (NK) cells are among the immune components involved in fighting
    cancer, and these are only active if they contain relatively large amounts of Vitamin C.
    Vitamin C also boosts the body’s production of interferon which has anti-cancer activity.
    In an important 1989 study, a group of Belgian researchers reported in Cancer that
    sodium ascorbate (vitamin C) and vitamin K3 were administered separately and in
    combination to human breast, oral, and endometrial cancer cell lines. While both had an
    inhibiting effect on cancer cell growth at high concentrations, combined administration of
    both vitamins demonstrated a synergistic inhibition of cell growth at much lower
    The inhibitory effect was suppressed by the addition of catalase to the culture, which
    suggested that the observed effect on cancer cells was connected to the formation of
    hydrogen peroxide. It has further interest because the presumed mechanism of the
    synergistic effect of these vitamins is hydrogen peroxide production. Hydrogen peroxide
    has long been a chemical of interest among some practitioners of alternative cancer
    therapies. See Hydrogen Peroxide.
    Other studies have demonstrated that stress linked to cancer lowers plasma levels of
    vitamin C in patients and in experimental animals. This has been demonstrated in patients
    with uterine, cervical, and ovarian cancer, and in leukemia and lymphoma patients. If
    cancer stress lowers vitamin C levels, and below-normal vitamin C levels diminish immune
    function, this would appear to be an additional rationale for vitamin C supplementation in
    cancer patients.
    Vitamin C is helpful when used in conjunction with radiotherapy. Hanck reviews the
    literature and describes the study:
    During radiotherapy, decrease of several vitamin levels, including vitamins E, B12, folic
    acid, and C have been observed. In addition, potentiation or augmentation of the lethal
    effect of radiation against tumor cells was demonstrated when ascorbic acid was coadministered.
    The effects of radiation therapy with adjunct ascorbic acid treatment were
    investigated in cancer patients in a prospective clinical trial.
    The patients were divided into two groups by random allocation. Patients had cancers of
    the tongue, tonsil, cervix, esophagus, neck, skin, lip, and cheek, and Ewing’s sarcoma.
    Progressive disease was seen after one month in 5% of the control group and 3% of the
    study group. These values had increased to 20% of the control group after 4 months and
    7% in the study group.
    Based on 20 cases, Hanck found 45% of the control group surviving without disease and
    50% with disease at 6 months; and 67% of the vitamin C group surviving without disease
    and 33% with disease at 6 months. He also found that, with the administration of vitamin
    C, patients suffered less anemia, less pain, and less loss of appetite and weight. All the
    side effects of radiotherapy tended to be reduced. And since it is tolerated extremely well,
    he also urged further clinical investigations of the effects of high doses of vitamin C.
    In a related study, Paul Okunieff of Massachusetts General Hospital also found vitamin C
    to protect both the skin and bone marrow against the effects of radiation. It was not found
    to be toxic to the tumor itself, nor did it protect the tumor from radiation.
    Another potentially significant finding for cancer patients is the protective effect vitamin C
    has displayed against potential damage to the heart by Adriamicin (ADR, doxorubicin) in
    animal studies.
    Experimental studies by Kedar N. Prasad of the University of Colorado Health Science
    Center have demonstrated that two forms of vitamin C, sodium L-ascorbate and sodium Dascorbate,
    enhanced the effectiveness of radiotherapy and the chemotherapeutic agents
    5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and bleomycin when used on mouse neuroblastoma cells but not on
    rat glioma cells.
    When one reads the experimental research literature on nutrients and cancer, it is replete
    with descriptions of studies where vitamins acted on one cell line but not on another, or
    even in opposite ways in different cell lines.
    Epidemiological studies demonstrate an indirect association between high vitamin C intake
    and a lowered risk of cancer, particularly cancer of the esophagus and stomach (indirect
    because they analyze foods known to contain high levels of vitamin C, not vitamin C itself).
    High consumption of fresh fruit specifically has been shown to protect against gastric
    A case-controlled study of vitamin C consumption and uterine cervical dysplasia, a
    premalignant condition, also showed a protective role for vitamin C; but a case-controlled
    study of colon cancer did not.
    33 of 46 epidemiological studies surveyed by Gladys Block, Ph.D., of the NCI showed
    significant protective effects of vitamin C. In aggregate, those in the top fourth of vitamin C
    intake had approximately half the cancer risk of the lowest fourth in terms of vitamin C
    Twenty-one of 29 studies assessing fruit intake demonstrated a protective effect,
    particularly for cancers of the esophagus, larynx, oral cavity, pancreas, stomach, rectum,
    and cervix. Block concluded that:
    “While it is likely that ascorbic acid, carotenoids, folate, and other factors in fruit and
    vegetables act jointly, an increasingly important role for ascorbic acid in cancer
    prevention would appear to be emerging.”
    One aspect of the protective effect of vitamin C may lie in its ability to inhibit the oncogenic
    transformation of cells. Richard Schwarz of the University of California at Berkeley
    demonstrated that the presence of vitamin C in a culture of primary avian tendon cells and
    oncogenic Rous sarcoma virus
    “stabilizes the normal state [of the cells] by reducing virus production and promoting the
    synthesis of differentiated proteins.”
    Experimental evidence demonstrates that vitamin C can also inhibit the formation of
    carcinogenic nitrosamines, which are found in tobacco smoke, marijuana, some
    cosmetics, corrosion inhibitors, rubber products, rubber nipples for baby bottles, and cured
    Precursors of nitrosamines are found in many foods: they react with sodium nitrite, a food
    preservative, to form carcinogenic nitrosamines in the acidic environment of the human
    stomach. Since vitamin C can inhibit the formation of nitrosamines in the stomach, this is
    widely assumed to be the basis for its protective effect against gastric cancers specifically.
    This capacity of vitamin C to reduce nitrosamine levels in the stomach was demonstrated
    with esophageal cancer patients in a study performed in northern China’s Lin-Xian
    province, an area where esophageal cancer is common. Researchers measured levels of
    nitrosamines in the stomach and lesions in the esophageal epithelium, and found a
    positive correlation: the higher the nitrosamine levels, the more lesions were found.
    They then gave experimental subjects 100-mg vitamin C supplements three times a day,
    an hour after meals. They found a marked decrease in urinary nitrosamine products, which
    became comparable to those in people in areas with low esophageal cancer risk.
    Another protective aspect of vitamin C is its antioxidant activity.
    Free radicals are potentially carcinogenic compounds created by both healthy and
    diseased cells in the course of cell respiration and intermediary metabolism. According to
    Carmia Borek of the departments of pathology and radiology at Columbia University
    College of Physicians and Surgeons:
    “The cellular oxidant state is of the utmost importance also in cellular protection against
    the oncogenic potential of radiation and chemicals. Inherent cellular factors comprised
    of enzymes, vitamins, micronutrients and low molecular weight substance are
    These include superoxide dismutase and catalase, peroxidase and thiols, vitamin A,
    vitamin C, and vitamin E and selenium. These antioxidants serve to defend the cells
    against elevated levels of free radicals produced by radiation, chemical carcinogens, and
    tumor promoters. The free radicals to varying degrees damage the cell.
    Borek summarizes the field as follows:
    “Free radicals are continuously produced by living cells. … Under optimal cellular
    metabolic conditions, cellular antioxidants are sufficient to impart protection against
    oxidant stress. However, under conditions of exposure to carcinogens or to unfavorable
    metabolic stress, which enhances free radical levels, inherent protection may prove to
    be inadequate leading eventually to neoplastic [cancerous] transformation. … Under
    stressful conditions, cells require the external addition of antioxidants to enable them to
    cope with the excess load of free radicals and to minimize the oxidative damage and
    oncogenic transformation.”
    Some nutrient antioxidants act directly; other agents such as selenium will impart their
    protection by inducing high levels of inherent protective enzyme systems, which destroy
    peroxides. This enables the cell itself to increase its scavenging powers and to cope with
    the “overload” of free radicals and their toxic products thus preventing the onset and
    progression of malignant transformation.
    The role of vitamin C as one of the primary defenses against oxygen free radicals is
    described by Etsuo Niki at the University of Tokyo:
    “Free radicals attack lipids, proteins, enzymes, and DNA to eventually cause a variety of
    pathological events and cancer. … When aqueous radicals were generated in the whole
    blood, ascorbic acid [vitamin C] scavenged them faster than any other antioxidants and
    protected lipids and proteins more effectively than bilirubin, uric acid, or tocopherol
    (vitamin E).”
    Similarly, Balz Frei and Bruce Ames at the University of California at Berkeley investigated
    the effectiveness of selected antioxidants in human blood plasma. Ascorbic acid proved to
    be the most effective of all the antioxidants they tested and the only one, which could
    prevent the initiation of lipid peroxidation, rather than simply lowering the rate at which the
    process occurs. They also found that the effect increased with the plasma concentration of
    ascorbic acid.
    Another pathway for the protective effects of vitamin C was proposed by Joachim Liehr at
    the University of Texas Medical Branch who found in animal studies that vitamin C may
    also play a role in inhibiting estrogen-induced carcinogenesis by reducing concentrations
    of metabolic byproducts of estrogen.
    The potential effects of vitamin C are closely related to dietary iron. According to Swiss
    researcher Alfred Hanck:
    “Iron deficiency is an aggravating factor in cancer patients. Only ferrous iron is absorbed
    and ascorbic acid converts food ferric iron to bioavailable ferrous iron. Vitamin C
    improves hemoglobin status and thus oxygen supply of tissue, with an increase in
    oxidative energy production. … The cytotoxic effect of ascorbic acid against malignant
    cells is significantly increased by chelation with ferrous iron. … This increased efficacy is
    attributed to the longer half-life of the ascorbate iron complex during cell contact
    compared to ascorbic acid.”
    Dr. Kedar Prasad, Director of the Center for Vitamins and Cancer Research at the
    University of Colorado School of Medicine, states on using vitamin C to treat cancer:
    “Most people associate antioxidants with their ability to eliminate free radicals, which
    helps prevent cancer.
    They do do that, but this is a different mechanism. Antioxidants cause damage to
    cancer cells because they have a marked effect on those genes involved in cell
    proliferation, or apoptosis (the programmed death of cells). By affecting gene
    expression, they help kill the cancer cells.
    Antioxidants also inhibit the cancer cells’ ability to repair after the chemo or radiation has
    dealt them a tough blow.
    Finally, antioxidants act as an anti-angiogenesis agent – preventing the formation of
    new blood vessels, which are crucial for cancer cell development. Standard therapies
    do not affect angiogenesis, so by combining the two together, you have better results.
    The two approaches attack the cancer cells in different and unique ways.”
    Research in 2004 shows that how ascorbic acid is delivered has a big impact on the
    amount that actually becomes physiologically available. A study by NIH scientists showed
    that much more vitamin C gets taken up when it is given via the intravenous route than
    when the vitamin is taken orally. The blood concentration of vitamin C when given
    intravenously was nearly 7 times greater than when the same amount was given orally.
    And the maximum tolerated dose was nearly 20 times higher.
    A new trial utilizing intavenous vitamin C was announced in 2003 by Dr. Jeanne A. Drisko
    of the University of Kansas Medical Center.
    “At this plasma level, vitamin C is chemotoxic to the cancer cells and appears to be nontoxic
    to healthy cells. But we are following white cell and platelet counts and other
    markers for possible toxicity from the vitamin C. Most patients need between 75 and
    100 grams infused to get to that plasma level.”
    Self-dosing with Vitamin C to treat cancer is not recommended as low dosing may protect
    some cancers, whilst dosing of anti-oxidants individually rather than part of a combined
    approach, may stimulate some cancers.
    Identify sources and best prices at Froogle. Just click Enter
    vitamin c in “Exact phrase”. Select “100 Results”. Select “Sort by Price: Low to High”.
    Further Reading and References
    • Cancer and Vitamin C: A Discussion of the Nature, Causes, Prevention, and Treatment of Cancer
    With Special Reference to the Value of Vitamin C by Ewan Cameron, Linus Pauling
    • Vitamin C and Cancer: Medicine or Politics? by Evelleen Richards
    • Evaluation of publicly available scientific evidence regarding certain nutrient-disease relationships: 8B.
    Vitamin C and cancer by Howerde E Sauberlich
    • Vitamin C & Cancer: Discovery, Recovery, Controversy by Abram, Md. Hoffer, et al
    • Fight Cancer with Vitamins and Supplements by by Kedar N. Prasad, Ph.D., and K. Che Prasad, M.D.
    • Vitamin C Against Cancer by H.L. Newbold
    • Vitamin C : The Future Is Now by Jeffrey S. Bland
    • Challenge Cancer and Win! Step-By-Step Nutrition Action Plans for Your Specific Cancer by Kim
    Dalzell, et al
    • World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17 by G. Edward Griffin
    • Murata A, Morishige F and Yamaguchi H. Prolongation of survival times of terminal cancer patients by
    administration of large doses of ascorbate. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research.
    23(Supp): 101-13. 1982.
    • Pauling L et al. Effect of dietary ascorbic acid on the incidence of spontaneous mammary tumors in
    RIII mice. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences. 82(15): 5185-89. August 1985.
    • Riordan N, Riordan H and Casiari J. Clinical and experimental experiences with intravenous vitamin
    C. Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, Special Issue: Proceedings from Vitamin C as Cancer
    Therapy Workshop, Montreal. 15(4): 201-13. 1999.
    • Campbell A, Jack T and Cameron E. Reticulum cell carcinoma: two complete spontaneous
    regressions, in response to high-dose ascorbic acid therapy. A report on subsequent progress.
    Oncology. 48(6): 495-97. 1991.
    • Karunanithy R Saha N, Ng SE. Serum and red blood cell magnesium, copper, and zinc content in
    G6PD definciency. Am J Hematol. 35(2): 136-8. Oct1990.
    • Riordan N et al. Intravenous ascorbate as a tumor cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent. Medical
    Hypothesis. 9(2): 207-13. 1994.
    • Lesperance ML, Olivotto LSA, Forde N, et al. Mega-dose vitamins and minerals in the treatment of
    non-metastatic breast cancer: an historical cohort study . Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;76: 137-143.
    • Hoffer A, Pauling L. Hardin Jones biostatistical analysis of mortality data for cohorts of cancer patients
    with a large fraction surviving at the termination of the study and a comparison of survival times of
    cancer patients receiving large regular oral doses of vitamin C and other nutrients with similar patients
    not receiving those doses . J. Orthomol Med. 1990;5: 143-154 .Reprinted in Cancer and Vitamin C, E.
    Cameron, L. Pauling, Camino Books. P.O. Box 59026, Philadelphia, PA 19102; 1993.
    • Vitamin C and Cancer: Discovery, Recovery, Controversy by A. Hoffer
    • Antioxidants Against Cancer by Ralph W. Moss Ph.D

    Vitamin C is essential to the formation of collagen, the protein
    “cement” that holds our cells together. Think of cells like bricks in a
    wall. The strength of a brick wall is not really in the bricks, but it is in
    the cement between the bricks. Collagen is this cement that holds
    your cells together. If collagen is abundant and strong, your cells
    hold together well. If cells stick together, tumors have a tough time
    spreading through them. Strong collagen can thereby arrest the
    spread of cancer.
    Cancer cells secrete an enzyme called “hyaluronidase,” which helps
    them eat away at collagen and break out into the rest of the body.
    This is described in great detail in the book Hyaluronidase and
    Cancer by Dr. Ewan Cameron, M.D. In order to prevent the
    hyaluronidase enzymes from dissolving collagen, Dr. Matthias Rath
    advocates increased consumption of the amino acids L‐Lysine and LProline
    and EGCG (a polyphenol catechin found in Green Tea) as
    companion nutrients with vitamin C. Laboratory trials have
    demonstrated the effectiveness of the combination of these 4
    substances at blocking the hyaluronidase enzymes.
    Vitamin C is required for our immune systems to generate and
    mobilize the leukocytes that fight cancer. Maximum immune
    function is vital if we want the body to fend off cancer. As I have
    mentioned, orthodox treatments like chemo and radiation destroy
    the immune system. In a 1995 publication, several physicians
    presented evidence that ascorbic acid (and its salts) are
    preferentially toxic to cancerous cells. In other words, vitamin C kills
    cancer cells while leaving normal cells alone.
    So, it appears that vitamin C not only strengthens the immune
    system, but it also preferentially kills cancer cells. This is fascinating.
    Preferential toxicity occurred in vitro in multiple tumor cell types.
    They also presented data suggesting that plasma concentrations of
    ascorbate required for killing tumor cells is achievable in humans.
    (Riordan NH, Riordan HD, Meng X, Li Y, Jackson JA. “Intravenous
    ascorbate as a tumor cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent,” Medical
    Hypotheses, 1995).
    And if that’s not enough reason to take vitamin C, then check this
    out: vitamin C assists with oxygen transport and is a powerful
    antioxidant. According to Dr. David Gregg, “Basically, the vitamin C is
    transported to the lungs in the blood where it is oxidized. It then is
    transported to the cells where it diffuses to the mitochondria and
    delivers its oxidation potential, powering the respiratory chain, and
    cycle repeats.”
    Dr. Gregg theorizes that the primary effect of the large doses of
    vitamin C is to serve as an oxygen transport molecule in the blood,
    substituting for hemoglobin (which cannot provide oxygen to cancer
    cells). He recommends a combination of vitamin C and vitamin E,
    since vitamin C transports oxygen in the cytoplasm (water phase)
    and vitamin E carries oxygen through the cell walls (oil phase).
    Dr. K.N. Prasad’s theory is that normal cells require only a minute,
    precisely controlled amount of antioxidants in order to function.
    They reject any excess. But among other defects, malignant cells
    have lost the capacity to regulate their uptake of antioxidants such
    as vitamin C and E. Antioxidants can therefore accumulate in cancer
    tissue in levels that can lead to the breakdown and death of
    malignant cells (Prasad KN. “Antioxidants in cancer care: when and
    how to use them as an adjunct standard and experimental therapies”
    Expert Rev Anticancer Therapy, 12/2003, 903‐15).
    Doctors A. Goth and I. Littmann in a paper entitled “Ascorbic Acid
    Content in Human Cancer Tissue” (Cancer Research, Vol. 8, 1948)
    described how cancer most frequently originates in organs with
    ascorbic acid (vitamin C) levels below 4.5 mg% and rarely grows in
    organs with higher levels. Do you see the connection? Remember
    how hydrogen peroxide is poured on wounds to kill germs?
    Research published in September of 2005 by Dr. Mark Levine has
    shown that high‐dose intravenous vitamin C can increase hydrogen
    peroxide (H2O2) levels within cancer cells and eradicate the cancer
    The awareness that vitamin C is useful in the treatment of cancer is
    largely attributable to the pioneering work of Dr. Linus Pauling, In
    1976, he and a Scottish surgeon, Dr. Ewan Cameron, reported that
    patients treated with high doses of vitamin C had survived three to
    four times longer than similar patients who did not receive vitamin C
    supplements. The study was conducted during the early 1970s at the
    Vale of Leven Hospital in Loch Lomonside, Scotland. Dr Cameron
    treated one hundred advanced cancer patients with ten thousand
    milligrams of vitamin C per day.
    The progress of these patients was then compared with that of one
    thousand patients (of other doctors) who had NOT received vitamin
    C. The findings were published in 1976, with Pauling as co‐author, in
    the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The 1976
    report emphasized that all of the patients had previously received
    conventional treatment (i.e. the “Big 3”). The vitamin C patients
    were reported to have a mean survival time of three hundred days
    longer than the other patients, with an improved quality of life.
    Their experiments proved conclusively that vitamin C is a superior
    treatment for terminal patients versus chemotherapy.
    The Cancer Industry was furious with Pauling and Cameron. There
    was no way that these two “quacks” and their vitamin therapy were
    going to cut into the chemotherapy cash cow! There was too much
    at stake for the Cancer Industry. Shareholders needed huge profits!
    The Boards of Directors needed 7‐figure salaries and golden
    parachutes! Children needed Ivy League educations! So, following
    standard operating procedure, there was a “smear” campaign to
    discredit Dr. Pauling. The truth about what Cameron and Pauling
    had discovered had to be crushed. But they had a big problem: the
    results of these tests had already been published in Cameron and
    Pauling’s book, Cancer and Vitamin C.
    So, the Cancer Industry and their cronies quickly went to work. They
    conducted three bogus studies with “predetermined” outcomes, all
    of which contradicted the findings of Cameron and Pauling. Here’s
    their dirty little secret: in all three studies, they failed to follow the
    selection protocol, failed to follow the treatment protocol, and
    performed some fancy linguistic and statistical tricks. Is it any
    wonder that, in the end, the Cancer Industry proudly proclaimed
    that Cameron and Pauling were quacks and that their research was
    not to be trusted? However, four totally independent studies used
    the same treatment protocol and got the same results as Pauling
    and Cameron. The three bogus studies did not use the same
    treatment protocol and did not get the same results.
    According to Webster Kehr, “The Mayo Clinic studies were done
    specifically to discredit the work of two‐time Nobel Prize winner Linus
    Pauling. Linus Pauling was getting people to believe there was
    “scientific evidence” for Vitamin C, and he had to be stopped. It is
    totally unacceptable (from the viewpoint of Big Pharma) for our
    corrupt government to allow any scientific evidence for alternative
    treatments of cancer. Because there was scientific evidence for
    Vitamin C, and because they could not shut‐up a two‐time Nobel Prize
    winner, there had to be bogus studies designed to divert people’s
    attention from the valid studies. Once the bogus studies were
    finished, the media could then take over the suppression of truth and
    immediately start blacklisting the valid studies.”
    Dr. Abram Hoffer is commonly credited with being the principal
    founder of the alternative health movement using nutritional
    (orthomolecular) treatment methods. During his practice, extending
    more than forty years, he treated thousands of patients primarily
    for cancer and schizophrenia, authoring many journal articles and
    books. As part of this effort, he collaborated with Dr. Linus Pauling
    in his focus on utilizing vitamin C (with other nutrients) for the
    treatment of cancer.
    How much vitamin C should you take? Studies have shown that in
    order to pump adequate levels of vitamin C into the cancerous cells,
    intravenous vitamin C (IVC) is the best protocol. Of course, you will
    need to be under the supervision of a doctor – you don’t want to try
    to give yourself an IV of vitamin C! The key is to be consistent with
    large quantities of vitamin C. It needs to be taken several times
    every day.
    Dr. Cameron’s article entitled “Protocol for the Intravenous Use of
    Vitamin C in the Treatment of Cancer” is available at this website:
    Despite voluminous data supporting a positive role of vitamin C in
    the treatment of cancer, the Cancer Industry continues to suppress
    the truth. In the words of Dr. Louis Lasagna of the University of
    Rochester Medical School, “It seems indefensible not to at least try
    substantial doses of vitamin C in these (terminal cancer) patients

  • jimmy-goat

    I first learned about this protocol several years ago, and have since
    then learned of several doctors who are using it. DMSO (dimethyl
    sulfoxide) is a highly non‐toxic, 100% natural product that comes
    from the wood industry. MSM (methyl sulfonyl methane) is basically
    DMSO with an additional oxygen atom attached to the sulfur atom,
    forming a molecule with a total of two attached oxygen atoms.
    MSM occurs in fresh fruit and vegetables, raw milk, wheat grass
    juice, and aloe vera in small amounts.
    Both DMSO and MSM have the property of being quite soluble in
    both oil and water based liquids. I use the term
    “DMSO” to refer to both substances, since according to biochemist
    Dr. David Gregg, “DMSO and MSM, which form each other in the
    body, should be essentially indistinguishable in their biochemical
    DMSO, as a healing agent, was introduced in the 1960s by a research
    team headed by Stanley W. Jacob, M.D., at the University of Oregon
    Medical School. A study was conducted in which DMSO was mixed
    with a haematoxylon (a purple dye) and injected into patients with
    cancer. The purpose of the study was to determine which cells
    would attract the DMSO. They learned that DMSO has an affinity for
    cancer cells. As a matter of fact, some of the cancer patients were
    cured during this study, even though DMSO was only being
    combined with a dye! (“Haematoxylon Dissolved in Dimethylsulfoxide
    [DMSO] Used in Recurrent Neoplasms” by E. J. Tucker, M.D., F.A.C.S.,
    and A. Carrizo, M.D., June 1968). The study also showed that DMSO
    could not only dissolve substances, but it could also penetrate
    human skin and carry the dissolved substances along with it! This is
    remarkable, because human skin is impenetrable to most
    How does it work? According to Dr. David Gregg, “in the body
    DMSO forms equilibrium with MSM (the oxidized form of DMSO) and
    the combination becomes an oxygen transport system, enhancing
    aerobic metabolism. This operates at only one point, the respiratory
    chain (at the inner membrane of the mitochondria).”
    Over the past four decades, more than 10,000 articles on the
    biologic implications of DMSO have appeared in the scientific
    literature and 30,000 articles on the chemistry of DMSO have also
    been published. The results of these studies strongly support the
    view that DMSO is a remarkable new therapeutic principle. In his
    book, Cancer & Natural Medicine, John Boik cites a number of
    publications where DMSO solutions have caused numerous forms of
    cancer in vitro (outside the living organism) to differentiate, thus
    reverting into normal cells through reestablishing aerobic
    Once aerobic metabolism is reestablished, the previously cancerous
    cells will eventually be eliminated via apoptosis. Remember,
    apoptosis is programmed cell death that happens to most normal
    cells in a matter of a couple of weeks. Reestablishing aerobic
    metabolism with DMSO will not correct genetic damage, but
    holding the cancer cells in a normal state long enough gives the
    natural process associated with healthy cells (i.e. apoptosis) time to
    kill the cancer cells. This is a bit of a paradox, but one way that
    DMSO kills cancer cells is through making them healthy.
    Of course, with an effective alternative treatment, you can expect
    the Cancer Industry’s cronies to go to work. According to Webster
    Kehr, “the FDA took note of the effectiveness of DMSO at treating
    pain and made it illegal for medical uses in order to protect the profits
    of the aspirin companies (in those days aspirin was used to treat
    arthritis). Thus, it must be sold today as a ‘solvent.’ Few people can
    grasp the concept that government agencies are started for the sole
    purpose of being the ‘police force’ of large, corrupt corporations.
    Buying the souls of politicians is as easy as giving candy to a baby.”
    While DMSO has been called “the most controversial therapeutic
    advance of modern times,” the controversy seems to be based on
    politics and money rather than science. Honestly, I wish we lived in a
    world where physicians would treat cancer patients with the proper
    treatment rather than have patients treat themselves at home.
    Unfortunately, due to the influence of Big Pharma, physicians are
    using treatments that have been chosen solely on the basis of their
    profitability rather than their effectiveness. When you consider the
    fact that DMSO is not a patentable drug, is cheap, safe and
    effective, and knowing what you should know about the Cancer
    Industry, is it any wonder that there is a smear campaign against
    Perhaps the most important attribute of DMSO/MSM is that it works
    in synergy with other treatments, such as cesium chloride, the most
    alkaline mineral in the world. It’s a fact that many parts of the world
    that have high levels of strong alkaline minerals in their water have
    a very low incidence of cancer. The Hunzakuts of Northern Pakistan
    have water high in cesium, and never develop cancer unless they
    move away from their homeland. The Hunzakuts also eat apricot
    kernels (which contain vitamin B17) on a regular basis.
    When cesium is transported into the cell, it is able to radically
    increase the intracellular pH of the cell. Once inside the cell, the
    cesium begins to pull potassium from the blood, thus it eventually
    blocks the cell’s intake of glucose, thus it stops the fermentation
    process, thus it starves the cell. The cesium also neutralizes the
    lactic acid which is produced with anaerobic respiration, thus
    stopping the cell from proliferating and stopping the “cachexia
    cycle“ at the cellular level.
    Perhaps the most well known physician to use cesium to treat
    cancer is Dr. H. E. Sartori. He began his cesium cancer therapy
    program in April 1981 at Life Sciences Universal Medical Clinics in
    Rockville, Maryland, where fifty patients with “terminal” cancer
    were treated. In other words, their cancer had metastasized to
    other organs and they were sent home to die. The medical
    establishment labeled their conditions as “hopeless” and “terminal.”
    Of the fifty patients, three were comatose, and forty‐seven had
    already completed maximum dosages of the “Big 3” before cesium
    was tried.
    Cesium chloride was given to patients, along with vitamin A, vitamin
    C, vitamin B17, zinc, and selenium. The diet consisted primarily of
    whole grains, vegetables, and linolenic acid rich foods such as
    flaxseed, walnut, and wheat germ. To increase efficiency of the
    treatment and improve the circulation and oxygenation, the
    patients received the chelating agent EDTA and DMSO. The study
    included ten patients with breast cancer, nine with colon cancer, six
    with prostate cancer, four had pancreatic cancer, six had lung
    cancer, three had liver cancer, three had lymphoma, one had pelvic
    cancer, and eight had cancer from an unknown site of origin.
    The results were astounding. Approximately fifty percent of
    patients with breast, colon, prostate, pancreatic, and lung cancer
    survived for at least three years, despite the fact that conventional
    doctors gave them only a few weeks to live! Thirteen patients died
    in the first two weeks of therapy. Autopsy results in each of these
    thirteen disclosed reduced tumor size from the cesium therapy.
    Amazingly, pain disappeared in all the patients within one to three
    days after initiation of cesium therapy. The write up of these studies
    can be found in Dr. Sartori’s book, Cancer – Orwellian or Utopian?
    Considering the fact that cesium chloride is typically only used on
    advanced cancer patients, Dr. Sartori’s fifty percent cure rate is
    astonishing. Here’s why: All of the patients had already been given
    their “death sentence” by conventional doctors. They were labeled
    as “terminal” and sent home to die. They likely had damage to their
    major organs from the toxic chemo treatments and/or radiation.
    Yet, still half of them were saved! This is truly remarkable.
    Remember, the cure rate for similar advanced cancer patients by
    orthodox medicine is close to zero percent.
    Dr. Keith Brewer (a physicist) became very interested in cancer in
    the 1930s. He discovered that cancer cells had an affinity for cesium.
    This fact is the reason that a radioactive isotope of cesium is
    commonly used as a “marker” to trace the movement of
    conventional chemotherapy drugs into a tumor. Introducing
    substantial amounts of cesium into the body, he reasoned, might
    cause a cancer cell to absorb enough to change its pH and disrupt
    anaerobic metabolism and the fermentation process it needed to
    stay alive.
    After extensive testing, Brewer determined that cesium or rubidium
    could raise the pH of cancer cells. Ultimately he focused on cesium
    because it was the more alkaline of the two. The question, however,
    was how to get enough cesium into the cancer cell to change its pH.
    Brewer determined that there were a number of vitamins and
    minerals (including vitamin B17) that greatly enhanced the absorption
    of these elements by the cancerous cells. By administering these
    substances in conjunction with the cesium, the level of the cesium
    absorbed was sufficient to kill the cancer cells.
    Here’s how. The cesium proceeded to alkalize the cancer cells, thus
    causing them to reestablish aerobic metabolism. This caused cell
    replication to cease and also caused normal apoptosis to occur
    within a few days. In 1981, tests were performed on 30 patients with
    cancer, and in all thirty patients, the cancerous tumors disappeared
    and the pain ceased within a couple of days. This protocol became
    the basis for the what is now called “High pH Therapy.”
    Remember the story of Neal Deoul? He had financed research on
    cesium and aloe vera to battle cancer (and AIDS). He was sued and
    his name was dragged through the mud in a lengthy court battle
    initiated by the Cancer Industry. During the court battle, Deoul was
    diagnosed with cancer, and turned to a form of high pH therapy,
    which eventually cured him of cancer. Great news for alternative
    cancer treatments; horrible news for the Cancer Industry. Since
    their court battle began in the late 1990s, Neal and his entire family
    have been horribly persecuted by the Cancer Industry. Read more
    about their story here: http://www.cancer‐
    DMSO binds with cesium chloride to get inside of cancer cells.
    However, what DMSO is really used for is to get the cesium chloride
    through the skin into the blood stream. The DMCC protocol is
    especially effective with brain cancer patients because of how
    quickly it gets past the blood‐brain barrier, but it can be used
    productively with any type of cancer.
    In a case study, one brain cancer patient had a tumor in his brain
    pressing against one of his optic nerves. When he mixed DMSO with
    the cesium chloride he could literally feel the cesium flooding into
    the tumor’s cancer cells within just a few minutes, since the tumor
    was pressing against his optic nerve.
    According to Dr. Robert R. Barefoot in his book, The Calcium Factor:
    The Scientific Secret of Health and Youth, “Cesium chloride is a
    natural salt, and where it is found, cancer does not exist. This is
    because cesium is the most caustic mineral that exists, and when it
    enters the body, it seeks out all of the acidic cancer hotspots, dousing
    the fire of cancer, thereby terminating the cancer within days. Also,
    when dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is rubbed near a painful cancer, the
    pain is removed and the DMSO causes the cesium to penetrate the
    cancer tumor much faster, thereby terminating the cancer much
    faster.” However, since this can also cause excessive swelling, in
    some cases it is better not to rub the cesium directly above the
    There are multiple theories on why and how the DMCC protocol
    stops cancer in its tracks. My theory is that the DMCC protocol
    transports enough oxygen to the cells that the condition of hypoxia
    is reversed and the cells reestablish aerobic metabolism.
    According to Dr. David Gregg, the cesium “cancer‐kill mechanism” is
    one (or a combination of) the following:
    1. It changes the osmotic pressure in the cancer cells relative to the
    surrounding media, causing them to swell and burst. (This is why
    the tumor swells, which can be dangerous in some cases.)
    2. It results in an opposing cesium & potassium concentration
    gradient that arrests the continued operation of the sodiumpotassium
    pump, arresting the sodium‐glucose co‐transport
    system feeding glucose into the cancer cell, thus starving the
    cancer cell.
    3. It results in an accumulation of negative ions inside the cancer
    cell, canceling the potential gradient across the cell membrane,
    which is required to energize the sodium‐glucose co‐transport
    system, thus starving the cell.
    4. It results in a breakdown of the cancer’s disguise which
    “deceives” the immune system, thus the cancer cell is made
    visible and is attacked/destroyed by the immune system.
    I suppose that it’s possible that all four mechanisms described by Dr.
    Gregg play a role in killing the cancer cells. In any event, regardless
    of the exact cancer‐kill mechanism, the fact of the matter is that the
    DMCC protocol kills cancer cells (either directly or indirectly), stops
    cancer from metastasizing (spreading), shrinks tumors within
    weeks, and alleviates pain within a few days, depending upon what
    is causing the pain. However, please understand that any level of
    swelling, inflammation, and/or congestion can be very dangerous,
    thus the DMCC protocol is not recommended for everyone.

  • Ted T.

    They laughed at Edison. Then billions of people used his light bulb for more than a hundred years. Candles and kerosene lamps were retired and no one laughed about that.

    They laughed at Tesla. Now the entire world uses alternating current for power and no one laughs about it.

    All pioneering ideas are ridiculed and scorned. Only visionary innovators who think outside the box, ignore ridicule and brainwashed minds are those who change the world’s mindset.

    Medical world is driven by money, not by curing illness. This has been mutated into brainwashing the public so they will ridicule anyone who wants to cure illness.

    A doctor one said perfectly in one sentence many years ago, “A patient cured is a customer lost.”

    • ‘They’ are paid to laugh.

Thank you for sharing. Follow us for the latest updates.

Send this to friend