America’s Invisible Crises – Connecting the Dots (Part 1):
Modern technology is growing by leaps and bounds. The corporate-controlled media extols its virtues, but does not cover the known harm of its dark side. Most of this technology goes unchecked for human safety.
The following is a short synopsis of the hazards of several invisible technologies that are already an unreported and grave danger to all of us.
For example, nano-technology, including nano-biotechnology, brought in $2.13 billion to corporations in 2012; but consumers are never told of the many dangers they pose. It is estimated by next year (2014), this unregulated industry may be worth $24 billion.
Nanotechnology is a manipulation of matter and works with the very basic building blocks of life. The scale is incredibly small: one nano-meter is one-billionth of a meter. So, it’s invisible, rarely listed in ingredients (although there are more than an estimated 1,000 products now on the market – no one knows the exact number of products); and it is unregulated and untested for either short or long-term dangers.
Products using nano-technology are found in: cosmetics (including sunscreens and anti-ageing creams); medicines; energy; electronics; clothes [for example, to make them very lightweight, or for socks to resist odors]; paints; various coatings; and scratch-resistant car bumpers.
This technology is also in the highly toxic Chemtrails aerosols, as nano-coated fiber Aluminum, that, for the past 15 years, are poisoning us daily. The Air Force has admitted to using them. Documents have been published on the Internet, over many years, listing various patents for these covert and criminal programs. And most recently, a former Air Force Industrial Hygienist has confirmed this stealth geo-engineering program from first-hand knowledge.
Retired Professor Ron Epstein, formerly at San Francisco State University, has compiled a list of websites linking nano health dangers.
Even as the technology’s health ramifications were barely understood, a 2003 report already noted:
“… that nanoparticles are showing up in the livers of research animals, can seep into living cells, and perhaps piggyback on bacteria to enter the food chain. The commercial use of nanoscale carbon was likened ‘to either the next best thing to sliced bread or the next asbestos.’ Despite these revelations, there is no regulatory body (and no plans for one) dedicated to overseeing this potent and powerfully invasive new technology.”(1)
In another more recent science report in 2011, it was noted that “nanoparticles in cells can disrupt important intracellular transport pathways … (and also) can interfere with the transport of vital substances in cells.”(2) As with asbestos and tabacco, manufacturers knew all along about the toxicity of these products. It is ignored, because Greed trumps everything else. This is all about massive corporate profits; but never about our safety or any kind of real precaution.
Then there is the explosion of use of RFID [Radio Frequency Identification] chips. They are made of a two-way radio antenna, and some encasement or support, such as small glass vial implanted under the skin. The origins of this technology go back to 1948 when the idea was first conceived. They are now found in ATM and credit cards, and some “enhanced” driver’s licenses, highway toll systems, and inventory tracking systems.
First our animals were RFID chipped. Supposedly, it was to keep track of them in case of theft or if the animal was lost. However, from the very beginning, there were medical reports that the site at which a dog or cat was chipped became the site of an aggressive carcinogenic tumor. Mainstream news did not report these dangers.
A review of the scientific literature from 1990-2006 documents “Microchip-Induced Tumors in Laboratory Rodents and Dogs.”(3) There are also numerous reports from pet magazines of microchipped animals who have developed these cancers soon after being chipped and then died.
Another scientific report on cancer and microchipping is here:
Inevitably, it was then just a short jump from our pets being chipped to the next step: our children. There are reports of children’s clothes being chipped to track them in school or for truancy. Some misguided and mis-informed parents thought that this would be a good way to keep tabs on their children; and they have supported having their children physically chipped. This is not only morally and ethically reprehensible, but also an invasion of privacy. This step now holds the same carcinogenic dangers for children that are also seen in pets.
The latest direction in chipping the human population comes from the hidden part of the Obama “health care” reform. Who reads more than 1,000 pages of mostly incomprehensible “doublethink” drivel? The Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed in 2010, and requires the implant of an RFID chip in every American. This chip will be inserted into our skin and linked to all our banking, medical, and other personal documents. Here is a short quote:
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘and is— ‘a class III device’; or ‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.’”(4)
Since there is no actual mention of the word “RFID” chipping in the bill, one must then go to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to find that this “medical device” is actually an RFID chip.(5) The entire wording of this document is loaded with doublespeak and massive obfuscation. It is a deliberate and criminal act of harm cloaked in Orwellian terminology. How many Americans know that this is part of this so-called health care “reform”?
So, we continued to be tracked by corporations and agencies – no longer working for us. Since these devices can be linked to constant and toxic monitoring, who isn’t to say that these chips could actually be “turned off” without our knowledge, and this terminates a life?
Katherine Albrecht, the co-author of “Spychips: How Major Corporations and Governments Plan to Track your Every Move” and head of the consumer group, Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering [CASPIAN] says:
“The reason you’re starting to see [RFID tags show up in credit and ATM cards] is that the industry itself did some studies and found that people spend more when they actually don’t have to handle their credit card. The act of looking at your card, and the act then of having to get out your pen and sign for [the purchase] creates many decision points at which a consumer could decide NOT [author emphasis] to make the purchase.”(6)
This is all about manipulating consumer choices, no matter what the risks involved. So far, four states have banned forced human RFID tagging: Wisconsin (2006), California (2008), Missouri (2008), and North Dakota (2012).
The EMF Global Grid
The Electromagnetic Frequency Spectrum is the scientific term for the entire range of light distribution and this goes from radio waves, to microwaves, infrared, visibile, ultraviolet, x-ray, to gamma waves.(7) At its lowest range, from 0 to 13 Hz, the body is in a relaxed state. Past that small range, there are various stages of increasing panic; and then damage to the human body ensues. These higher ranges emit various levels of massive electroshocks per second. This includes: wireless internet technology, mobile phones, cordless phones, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, computers, and AC current in TVs.
As one of the world’s leading EMF scientists, Prof. Olle Johansson, has noted many times: “This is the first time in human history that we are constantly exposed to this technology, 24/7/365. It is unprecedented.” Prof. Johannson has been researching the EMF Spectrum for almost 40 years, and has written many scientific journal articles, noting the cumulative dangers of this constant exposure.
Here are four links to his research:
1. Cell phone dangers: www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS7YIZ1x0r8
2. Wake-up Call from Prof. Johansson: www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdmQDJ9WOiQ
3. This is part 1 of a 2-part interview Prof. Johansson and I did:
4. Irreversible sterility: www.youtube.com/watch?v=BH3gJctqKk4
In essence, there is no safe level for this invisibile, but highly dangerous, EMF bombardment. We are constantly surrounded by it via thousands of cell towers linking to satellites; and the electrosmog pollution has already had devastating effects on all living beings [humans, animals, and plants]. We now have an epidemic of glioma brain cancers from cell phone use. This used to be a rare form of cancer, now it is prevalent, yet hardly noted by the mass media.
When there are 6-billion cell phones in use, the corporate profits continue to take precedence over our safety. This was “cool” technology when Star Trek’s Captain Kirk was using his communicator 40 years ago. Now, it is our deadly cell phone.
There is also a link between this wireless, cellular communication and Chemtrails. Barium is one of the main ingredients in this toxic aerosol, and it is an excellent conductor of electromagnetic energy. We have been breathing a hazardous level of Barium for almost 15 years. Long-term exposure damages the lungs and heart.
When a person uses a cell phone regularly, a common complaint is severe headaches. As little as two minutes on a cell phone is enough to open the blood-brain barrier “allowing blood proteins inside to disrupt brain signals and start killing brain cells. A cell phone typically transmits at 2 watts.” This creates a situation where blood toxins and proteins enter the brain and neurons are damaged in the brain’s memory and thinking areas.
Dr. Leif Salford notes that he is finding an “astonishing number of dead neuron cells, actually [people] suffering holes in the brain from the damage” created by just one cell phone call. The serious memory problems already seen worldwide are, in great part, due to this link between barium with its electrical conductivity and constant EMF exposure.
Over the past two years, I have written several articles on the extreme dangers of “Smart” Meters – using another part of the EMF Spectrum. It is the planned global change from analogue meters to digital meters. It is being done supposedly to upgrade the entire global energy system. Done by many different companies worldwide, the changeover involves billions of dollars for corporations. However, not one of these companies has ever advised their customers of the many known dangers. See:
1. “Smart Meter Dangers: The Latest from, Dr. David O. Carpenter. July 14, 2012:
2. “Smart Meter Dangers Update: Scientific Proof of These Hazards.” Feb. 10, 2012:
3. “Radiofrequency Radiation: The Invisibile Hazards of “Smart Meters” Aug. 19, 2011:
None of this technology is even remotely safe. For decades, we continue to be uninformed experimental lab rats. But when we are exposed to a multi-pronged environmental assault that already has devastating consequences to our well being, safety, and even our ability to reproduce, it is way past time that we hold “public” officials and corporate criminals accountable.
What can we do? I have a workable, real plan. Watch for Part 2 next week.
About the Author
Environmental writer and educator Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri is the author of the highly acclaimed book “The Uterine Crisis”, the result of 15 years of independent research linking women’s reproductive illnesses with invisible environmental toxins. London’s “The Ecologist” calls this book an “inspiration”. For decades, Dr. Perlingieri has been writing about the links between chronic exposure to invisible environmental toxins and dramatic increases in illness. Her cross-disciplinary lecture at the first US Chemtrails conference in August 2012 was live-streamed to 30 countries. Dr. Perlingieri continues to take a cross-disciplinary approach to all her research. She has a background in both science and art. In addition to her graduate academic degrees, she also has had formal herbal training and studies in the US, London, and Italy.
1. “No Small Matter! Nanotech Particles Penetrate Living Cells and Accumulate in Animal Organs.”
2. “Health Risks With Nanotechnology? Nanoparticles Can Hinder Intracellular Transport.” Science Daily. Aug. 24, 2011:
3. Katherine Albrecht. “Microchip-Induced Tumors in Laboratory Rodents and Dogs. A Review of the Literature 1990-2006.” 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society.”
4. H.R. 3200, section 2521, page 1001, paragraph 1. There is also a version, HR 3590.
See also: www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsbgqTCS9ZQ
5. “Another Hidden Secret in Obamacare “RFID CHIP Implants.” Jan. 22, 2011:
and from the FDA’s website on “Medical Devices”:
6. “Experts Warn RFID Risks Outweigh Benefits.” Oct. 19, 2011:
7. Two good sources of visuals on the EMF Spectrum are:
~~ Help Waking Times to raise the vibration by sharing this article with the buttons below…