GM Wheat May Damage Human Genetics Permanently

October 18, 2012 | By | 5 Replies More

Heidi Stevenson
Waking Times 

The Australian government, in the form of its science research arm, is joining Agribusiness profiteering by designing a GM wheat that could kill people who eat it & be inherited by their children.

We have not yet seen the worst damage that genetic engineering may do. Australia’s governmental agency, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), is developing a wheat species that is engineered to turn off genes permanently.

Professor Jack Heinemann at the University of Canterbury’s Centre for Integrated Research in Biosafety  has studied the wheat’s potential. Digital Journal reports that he says1:

What we found is that the molecules created in this wheat, intended to silence wheat genes, can match human genes, and through ingestion, these molecules can enter human beings and potentially silence our genes. The findings are absolutely assured. There is no doubt that these matches exist.

The implications are clarified by Professor Judy Carman of Flinders University:

If this silences the same gene in us that it silences in the wheat—well, children who are born with this enzyme not working tend to die by the age of about five.

Silencing the equivalent gene in humans that is silenced in this genetically modified wheat holds the potential of killing people. But it gets worse. Silenced genes are permanently silenced and can be passed down the generations.

Silenced Genes

The wheat genes involved are called SEI. The specific sequences of those genes are being termed classified confidential information. CSIRO, which is part of the Australian government, is developing a commercial application, but refuses to divulge the information that’s most significant to the people of Australia! The government is apparently more interested in profits than in the people’s safety.

Dr. Heinemann was asked to provide his opinion of CSIRO’s genetic engineering on wheat plants and produced the report “Evaluation of risks from creation of novel RNA molecules in genetically engineered wheat plants and recommendations for risk assessment”2. He discusses the nature of the genetic entities that are being played with and explains how they can affect human health.

RNA is similar to DNA, which is the molecule that carries genetic inheritance. There are several types of RNA, but a particular group called double stranded RNA (dsRNA) is of concern. Heinemann writes:

dsRNAs are remarkably stable in the environment. Insects and worms that feed on plants that make dsRNA can take in the dsRNA through their digestive system, where it remains intact.

He delineates research documenting that once dsRNA is taken through an animal’s skin or digestive tract, it can wreak havoc. It circulates throughout the body and has been known to be amplified or cause a secondary reaction that:

… leads to more and different dsRNAs (“secondary” dsRNAs) with unpredictable targets.

Heinemann points out that a silencing effect on a gene, once initiated, can be inherited. Though it’s known to happen, little is yet known about the process.

dsRNA is known to be a tough molecule. It survives readily, even through digestion. Worse, though, it’s known to pass into the body through digestion. Then, as Dr. Heinemann writes:

Once taken up, the dsRNA can circulate throughout the body and alter gene expression in  the animal.

That is, gene expression can be altered as the result of eating a food with dsRNA altered by genetic engineering. Judy Carman, of Flinders University, who also provided an expert opinion, wrote in “Expert Scientific Opinion on CSIRO GM Wheat Varieties”3:

In fact, employees from the world’s largest GM company, Monsanto, have written at least one paper about how to commercially exploit the fact that dsRNA survives digestion in insects, in their attempts to try to control insect pests of plants. That is, the plant is genetically engineered to produce a dsRNA, which insects ingest when they eat the plant; the dsRNA survives digestion in the insect and then silences genes in the insect to stunt its growth and kill it.

There can be no question that dsRNA can be transferred to humans by eating.

The Risks

Heinemann makes these three points:

  1. Plant-derived microRNA [a type of dsRNA] precursors have been detected in human blood, thus demonstrating that they can survive the human digestive tract and be passed into the body through it. He emphasizes: “There is strong evidence that siRNAs [a type of dsRNA and the one of particular concern here] produced in the wheat will transfer to humans through food.”
  2. dsRNA that have been shown to transmit to humans through food have also been shown to survive cooking! He points out: “There is strong evidence that siRNAs produced in the wheat will remain in a form that can transmit to humans even when the wheat has been cooked or processed for use in food.”
  3. Plant-derived dsRNA was able to silence a human gene in cultured cells. He wrote: “There is strong evidence that once transmitted, siRNA produced in wheat would have the biological capacity to cause an effect.”

Judy Carman states succintly:

As a result, there is a chain of evidence to show that there is a risk that the dsRNA from this GM wheat may survive digestion, enter the tissues of people that eat it and silence a gene or genes in those people. There is also evidence that any genetic changes so produced may be stable and become established in many cells of an organ. Furthermore, there a possibility that these changes may be passed-on to future generations.

The wheat genes involved are called SEI. They have extensive similarities with the human GBE gene, which controls glycogen storage. If the GBE gene is defective, it leads to certain death from liver cirrhosis at a very young age. Another defect in the gene results in adult polyglucosan body disease (APBD) in adults over age 40, causing cognitive impairment, pyramidal quadriplegia, peripheral neuropathy, and neurogenic bladder.

Dr. Heinemann investigated and found that sections of the two genes, SEI and GBE, are a perfect match. Because CSIRO is saying that the specific SEI sequence that’s modified is classified confidential information, we cannot know for certain what harm might be done to humans. However, it’s obvious that shutting down a section of the GBE gene holds the potential of death—yet, Heinemann showed that it’s not only possible, it’s likely!

Lack of Adequate Risk Assessment

Judy Carman focused more on the lack of appropriate or adequate risk assessment for the modified wheat. She is very concerned that no consideration was given to checking for:

  • Whether there are adverse effects on animals or humans who eat it.
  • Whether there is any uptake of dsRNA in animals or humans who eat it.
  • Silencing of genes in animals or people.
  • Silencing of the branching enzyme.
  • Toxic effects, such as damage to the liver, kidneys, or any other organ.
  • Increase in reproductive problems.
  • Whether dsRNA changes are inherited.
  • Increased risk of cancer.
  • Increased risk of wheat allergies

She is very concerned that the oversight agency, the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), and CSIRO “appear not to be looking for any adverse effects in people, but intend to go directly to look for any benefits.” She concludes:

It appears that neither organisation has appreciated or properly safety assessed this wheat in the light of the fact that the dsRNA produced in these GM wheat varieties may survive digestion, enter the tissues of the body and silence a gene or genes in the recipient. It also appears that neither organisation has “joined the dots” to appreciate that, of all the genes that could be silenced, the most likely one is a similar branching enzyme in animals and people and that silencing it could seriously impair or even kill those that eat it.

The Australian government appears to have become nothing more than another Agribusiness corporate entity. They’re using the people’s money to fund a massive profit-making venture in genetic engineering without any consideration for the potential harm that may be done to either the environment or the welfare of the people. Not only are they willing to risk mass deaths from products they’re hoping to put on the market, they also seem to have no concern for whether they might be doing permanent damage to generations that follow.

Resources

  1. Scientists: New GMO wheat may ‘silence’ vital human genes
  2. Evaluation of risks from creation of novel RNA molecules in genetically engineered wheat plants and recommendations for risk assessment
  3. Expert Scientific Opinion on CSIRO GM Wheat Varieties
  4. CSIRO SEI/SEII SHRNA GM WHEAT FOR PRODUCING GRAINS WITH A LOWER 
    CONTENT OF BRANCHED STARCH MOLECULES, Appraisal of statements by Prof Jack Heinemann and Assoc Prof Judy Carman
  5. The GMOs, nature and effect of the genetic modification
  6. GBE Antibodies
About the Author

Heidi Stevenson is Allopathy’s Gadfly. She’s an iatrogenic survivor whose prior career in computer science, research, and writing was lost as a result. She has turned her skills towards exposing the modern medical scam and the politics surrounding it, along with providing information about the effectiveness of much alternative medicine, without which she would not be here today acting as Allopathy’s Gadfly. Find her work on GaiaHealth.com

This article originally appeared at GreenMedInfo.com, an excellent source of news and information about natural health and wellness. 

Tags: , , , , ,

Category: Agriculture, Body, Community, Earth, Food, Natural Health, Science, Self, Society, Time & Space

Comments (5)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. George Matthews says:

    When will the people wake up and decide it is time to kill the people making and promoting these GM foods? They are going to use these GM foods against us. They are pissed we learned about it/ THis just absolutely means we must quit eating anything they have in the grocery store. We must grow our own. Sure we won’t be able to get fresh fruit and veggies all year, but you must grow your own fruits and veggies and just can them to eat later. One hundred years ago you had to can your stuff. You don’t have to have fresh. Canned peaches and pears are just as good as fresh. USre fresh tastes a tad better, but you have no choice unless you live in Miami or close to the equator to be able to grow food all year. It makes no sense to haul all these fruits and veggiues up the road all the time. Just eat what is in season in your area.

  2. mothman777 says:

    Looks like the Bolshevik Monsanto proteges of Comrade Stalin are going to be successful in their attempt to whack us all.

    People just have a helpless infant school mentality that the people manufacturing GMO’s are nice, ordinary people, and that no one would ever do anything nasty to them. Why would they? What would be the point or the sense in anyone doing that? So it isn’t happening, they tell themselves.

    Their indolence, willful ignorance, and cowardice will be the end of all, precluding the possibility of healthy future generations with the exception of all but one select people.

  3. mothman777 says:

    CORRECTION:

    Their indolence, willful ignorance, and cowardice will be the end of all, precluding the possibility of healthy future generations being born in almost all the peoples of the world, with the exception of merely one select people.

  4. joe says:

    lies lies bollocks and more lies! the high priests of science know EVERYTHING!!! it’s SCIENCE for chrissakes! did you hear me? i said SCIENCE! THE INFALLIBLE CHURCH OF SCIENCE! if a scientist said it’s ok, THEN IT’S OK! because SCIENCE is the new GOD, omniscient and omnipotent. HOW DARE YOU QUESTION THE CHURCH OF SCIENCE!!! what are you, SOME KIND OF TERRORISTS? only a TERRORIST would question ALMIGHTY SCIENCE!

  5. Karen Scribner says:

    Forget this, wheat has already been manipulated. The wheat in use now is hybridized and is a untested, primitive genetic manipulation created in the 1960s and 1970s and in common usage by 1985. The wheat made itself new proteins that are making people sensitive or allergic to wheat protein. This is not a gluten problem (gluten is in all grains, that is seeds of grasses.) This is a wheat problem which has been researched so information is available.

Leave a Reply

Must Watch Videos

Humans of Manufactured Purpose

Humans of Manufactured Purpose













Raghav Bubna, Fractal Enlightenment
Waking Times

Until we are born we don’t have any perception of existence riddling within us, we are lovingly thrust into birth by the biological frivolity of corporeal matter and witness the first moments in our life of purest expression.

As children we interact through experience … More

July 18, 2014 | By | Reply More
Not Just the Bees – Pesticides Wiping Out Birds Too

Not Just the Bees – Pesticides Wiping Out Birds Too













Heather Callaghan, Contributor
Waking Times

Netherlands researchers fear the second coming of Silent Spring.

“Neonicotinoids were always regarded as selective toxins. But our results suggest that they may affect the entire ecosystem,” says Hans de Kroon of Radboud University and co-author of a study recently published in Nature journal.… More

July 18, 2014 | By | Reply More
The Importance of Sleep, and the Hazards of “Dream Deprivation”

The Importance of Sleep, and the Hazards of “Dream Deprivation”













Dr. Mercola
Waking Times

Dr. Rubin Naiman, author of Hush: A Book of Bedtime Contemplations, is a clinical psychologist and assistant professor of medicine at the University of Arizona Center for Integrative Medicine directed by Dr. Andrew Weil. As a sleep and dream expert, his focus is how sleeping … More

July 14, 2014 | By | 2 Replies More
Why Do Scientists Deny Psychic Phenomena?

Why Do Scientists Deny Psychic Phenomena?













Aliston Texeira, Fractal Enlightenment
Waking Times

Even though films like ‘Inception’, ‘Waking Life‘ and more recently, ‘John Dies at the End’ and ‘Now You See Me’ wouldn’t be approachable without assuming the authenticity of unexplainable events, most people, including most scientists, are unaware of the vast abundance of … More

July 12, 2014 | By | 8 Replies More
Team of Ecologists Estimate That We Could See Salt-Water Fish Extinction In Just Over 30 Years

Team of Ecologists Estimate That We Could See Salt-Water Fish Extinction In Just Over 30 Years













Marco Torres, Prevent Disease
Waking Times

After analyzing several different kinds of data relating to biodiversity, researchers have stated that overfishing, pollution, and habitat loss will be responsible for a loss of most ocean species by 2048.

That’s when the world’s oceans will be empty of most fish, predicted an … More

July 8, 2014 | By | Reply More

Activism Works

Triumph For Citizens in Florida As Hughes Oil Company Drops Fracking Project

Triumph For Citizens in Florida As Hughes Oil Company Drops Fracking Project













Julie Dermansky, DeSmogBlog
Waking Times

On Friday morning, Dan A. Hughes Oil Company and the Collier Resources Company agreed to terminate their lease agreement, with the exception of the Collier Hogan 20-3H well, next to the Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary in Naples, Florida.

Hughes Oil dropped its plans to drill … More

July 14, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More
A Forgotten Community in New Orleans: Life on a Superfund Site

A Forgotten Community in New Orleans: Life on a Superfund Site













Julie Dermansky, DeSmogBlog
Waking Times

Shannon Rainey lives in a house that was built on top of a Superfund site in the Upper Ninth Ward of New Orleans.

“I bought my house when I was 25, and thirty years later, I still can’t get out,” she told DeSmogBlog.

Rainey’s … More

June 23, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More
Wave of GMO Labeling Victories Emboldens Movement to Take Back Food Democracy

Wave of GMO Labeling Victories Emboldens Movement to Take Back Food Democracy













Michele Simon, EcoWatch
Waking Times

The East Coast has been getting most of the attention lately on the state by state effort to label genetically-engineered food. Vermont recently passed a bill and New York State’s bill is now moving. But let’s not forget about the western states, which are also … More

June 11, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More
Monsanto’s Roundup Found in 75% of Air and Rain Samples

Monsanto’s Roundup Found in 75% of Air and Rain Samples













John Deike, EcoWatch
Waking Times

A new U.S. Geological Survey has concluded that pesticides can be found in, well, just about anything.

Roundup herbicide, Monsanto’s flagship weed killer, was present in 75 percent of air and rainfall test samples, according to the study, which focused on Mississippi’s highly fertile … More

May 27, 2014 | By | 2 Replies More
How to Bring Minerals Back Into the Soil and Food Supply

How to Bring Minerals Back Into the Soil and Food Supply













Dr. Mercola
Waking Times

There are now many studies clearly documenting that if you eat processed foods, you’re being exposed to toxic herbicides. These toxic chemicals have been found in everything from breast milk to umbilical cords and placentas.

This of course means that children are now born with a … More

May 26, 2014 | By | 3 Replies More