When It’s Time For a Health Check-up, Avoiding Your Doctor Can Save Your Life

July 26, 2012 | By | 4 Replies More

Dave Mihalovic, Prevent Disease
Waking Times

Today, more than ever, conventional medicine is one of the biggest threats to your health. You’re nearly 300,000 times more likely to die from a preventable medical injury during a hospital stay.

Pharmaceutical drugs are 62,000 times more likely to kill you than food supplements and 7,750 times more likely to kill you than herbal remedies. CT scans are a major cause of the breast cancer they are supposed to detect. No ifs, ands or buts about it, Doctors are a leading cause of death and if you want to a live longer life, you’ll avoid them.

When Brian Mulroney, the former Canadian prime minister, went for a check-up in 2005 he was given a CT scan.

This discovered two small lumps in his lungs, and surgery was recommended.

The operation was complicated by inflammation of the pancreas — a serious condition which meant being in intensive care.

He spent six weeks in hospital but was readmitted a month later because a cyst, which had developed on his pancreas because of the inflammation, had to be removed as well.

All those operations, scans, time off work, tests — but some say such medical testing is worth it if they catch the nodules early and save lives isn’t it? Not at all. The nodules weren’t cancer — they were benign.

Essentially, Mulroney had surgery and complications for a ‘problem’ that hadn’t actually been a problem. This happends thousands of times per day across mainstream medicine.

‘Body MOT’ screening tests — like those the politician had — are done for people who are completely well and have no symptoms.

clampdown on clinics offering MOT health checks to the worried well — which can include whole body scans — has been signaled by governments, amid concerns over the exposure of healthy people to unnecessary radiation.

How could an innocent check-up be harmful?

Part of the problem of looking for abnormalities in perfectly well people is that rather a lot of us have them.

The crux is that most of them won’t do us any harm.

There’s a well known story of a patient who was rather paranoid about contracting lung cancer. He was never a smoker or regularly exposed to second hand smoke, but his father had lung cancer so he thought his genes predetermined his fate. The patient tested himself every year with medical scans he thought would spot the cancer if it were to grow. One day a doctor saw a spot on his lung after a scan and diagnosed it as cancer. The patient underwent all sorts of medical treatment, including radiation. He ended up dying six months later from cancer that actually did form in the lung. Six months later his family reviewed old x-rays from previous scans of his lungs that the patient had completed 15 years earlier. The exact same spot in the same position was always there.

Part of the problem of looking for abnormalities in perfectly well people is that rather a lot of us have them.

So, for example, if you do MRI scans of the brain in people who are healthy, you will find that 1.8 percent have a swelling in an artery, an aneurysm, and 1.6 percent will have a meningioma — a type of brain tumour.

Yet these people have no symptoms and the vast majority will never develop any problems related to what the scan shows.

Many cancers will subside without treatment, however most patients don’t want to risk cancer growth. What people don’t often think about is that what you do know can often kill you. In other words, the knowledge of cancer can actually promote further cancer growth if that’s what you believe. Psychological studies and assessments on patients have established that 78% of people are more likely to become ill if they believe they will contract the illness from a coworker or family member.

When pathologists examine prostate glands from men who have died from an unrelated cause, they find that between 45 and 80 percent of the men — particularly if they’re older — have prostate cancer.

Yet this hadn’t caused them harm and wasn’t responsible for their deaths. If those same men sought treatment for this condition, their risk of death increases and this correlates well with their participation in conventional medical care.

Or take heavy smokers, screened for lung cancer using CT scans. In at least 20 percent of patients, cancer is picked up on the scan — but this is a ‘cancer’ that would grow slowly and would not affect the person’s life span.

In a Swedish study of 60,000 women, 70 percent of the mammographically detected tumors weren’t tumors at all. These “false positives” aren’t just financial and emotional strains, they may also lead to many unnecessary and invasive biopsies. In fact, 70 to 80 percent of all positive mammograms do not, upon biopsy, show any presence of cancer.

Perhaps one of the most damning reports was a large scale study by Johns Hopkins published in 2008 in the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association’s Archives of Internal Medicine (Arch Intern Med. 2008;168[21:2302-2303). In the Background to the research it was pointed out that breast cancer diagnosis rates increased significantly in four Scandanavian counties after women there began receiving mammograms every two years.

In the study looking at two large scale groups of women in Norway, one having a mammogram every two years for 6 years, the other just at the end, the researchers themselves went on to conclude that they cannot link the increased incidence of breast cancer diagnosis simply to more real cases being detected because the rates among regularly screened women were significantly higher than rates among women of the same age who only received a mammogram at the end of the same six year period.

You might think picking this up is good, safe medicine?

Sadly, it’s not. These people are ‘overdiagnosed’ — they’re told they have cancer, when it won’t go on to cause symptoms or an earlier death.

But they are treated as though they have a life-threatening condition. This means they get the risks of treatment, without the benefits.

Medical mistake kill 100,000 Americans per year. The total cost of medical mistakes, lost income and production, cost of disability and health care, totals $17 to 29 billion a year. Dr. Mercola lists a brilliant series of top reasons to avoid your doctor. Everything from mammograms to depression and high blood pressure are a greater risk to your health diagnosed by a medical doctor rather than undiagnosed.

Everything abnormal gets treated with treated drugs, operations, radiotherapy or chemotherapy. What is wrong with that picture?

If you are overdiagnosed — given a label of a disease which was never going to harm you — there’s no chance you can benefit from the treatment. You can only get side-effects.

Overdiagnosis is one of the enormous issues in modern medicine, but most patients don’t know it. This is partly because of a strange paradox.

The more unnecessary treatments that are given, the more people believe their lives have been saved by screening. The opposite is true.

Giving lots of people a ‘false alarm’ from a disease they were never going to die of — and then pronouncing them ‘cured’ — makes it seem as though screening was successful.

In other words, the more popular a screening test is, the worse the test may be.

What if these people knew that the stress of the diagnosis and treatment was for a cancer that wasn’t going to harm them?

In reality, overdiagnosis is a risk in most screening tests, such as the national screening programme for breast cancer.

Around a quarter of women diagnosed with breast cancer as a result of routine mammograms are overdiagnosed — they were treated with surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy for a cancer that wouldn’t have harmed them.

What patients need to remember is that the pros of screening should outweigh the cons. This is rarely considered by the patient and not properly conveyed by the doctor.

For example, the are many clinics who offer an ultrasound of the arteries in the neck for those who have been at high risk for stroke.

A narrowing of these arteries can lead to a stroke. So wouldn’t it be a good idea to find out about them before they cause one?

It sounds temptingly logical. In people who have had a stroke or a ministroke, having this scan to see if further treatment is needed is very useful.

But for people who are completely well and haven’t had a stroke or mini-stroke, the research is compelling — for not doing it.

The problem is that an operation to correct the narrowing of arteries is more dangerous — with complications including death and actually causing a stroke — than the risk of a stroke happening through not operating.

This balance of risks is the reason why the ultrasound is not offered in most countries in the world.

Margaret McCartney, a GP based in Scotland was recently involved with an investigation from the independent consumer organisation Which?, who telephoned five such clinics that used CT and MRI scans to get further information about the tests they ran.

Three of them didn’t mention the risks of overdiagnosis, and one only partially covered the risks.

Surely if you are going to spend thousands you would want to have the potential for harm spelled out at the first opportunity?

Potential patients need to know what they’re getting into — well before they get into the costly screening scanner.

If you want to truly prevent disease you must avoid conventional medicine and take care of your own health. This includes, avoiding as many chemicals and pollutants as possible. Drinking clean, chemical-free water without fluoride. Exposing your body to sunlight. Choosing the right diet strategy for your body type while avoiding genetically modified foods. Exercising while trying to minimize stress and anxiety. Avoiding pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines at all costs. Most of all, don’t give another person power over your health regardless of their credentials. Take control because nobody knows your body like you do.

Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.

~~ Help Waking Times to raise the vibration by sharing this article with the buttons below…

Tags: , , , , , ,

Category: Body, Business, Healthcare, Ideas, Money, Natural Health, Resources, Revolution, Science, Self, Society, Time & Space

Comments (4)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Bonita says:

    Amen! My mother was in excellent health until she she was eligible for medicare. She went to a new md who diagnosed and prescribed a slew of drugs which within a very short time left this vibrant and loving woman unable to think clearly. The side affects left her unable to care for herself, think clearly or live a normal life. It was like day to night.

    Prior to that she had always used alternative health care, and lived healthy and happy. The immediate and drastic difference in her character and health upon using the over prescribed drugs was beyond coincidence.

  2. Lisa Pruitt says:

    I never go to doctors for anything. I eat healthy,mostly organic, take vitamins and the wonderful health foods all those wonderful people put out for us. I’m 68 and feeling great – NO PROBLEMS! I’m scared to death of doctors.

  3. John says:

    The Doctors are braiwashed by the drugs companies,there where a strike of doctors and during the time the dead percetage lowerred by 40%,there is also population controll systems in most countries as well,John

Leave a Reply

Must Watch Videos

An Introduction to Awakening

An Introduction to Awakening













Zen Gardner, Guest
Waking Times

The waking up process is a very personal experience. Once we become aware of the existence of a fabricated world we thought to be real and that our true nature is anything but what we’ve been told, there’s no turning back.

It may appear to … More

April 21, 2014 | By | Reply More
Nearly a Thousand Environmental Activists Murdered Worldwide Since 2002

Nearly a Thousand Environmental Activists Murdered Worldwide Since 2002













Jeremy Hance, Mongabay
Waking Times

At least 908 people were murdered for taking a stand to defend the environment between 2002 and 2013, according to a new report today from Global Witness, which shows a dramatic uptick in the murder rate during the past four years. Notably, the report appears … More

April 19, 2014 | By | 5 Replies More
Open Source Plans for Modern Tesla Free Energy Generator Released to Public

Open Source Plans for Modern Tesla Free Energy Generator Released to Public













Terence Newton, Staff Writer
Waking Times

In a world of problems and solutions, few ideas spur both immediate hope and skepticism as the idea of free energy, and, on the brink of ecological disaster, nothing may be of greater importance to the human race.

The story of Nikola More

April 14, 2014 | By | 44 Replies More
Neuroscientist Exposes Dangers of Electromagnetic Fields

Neuroscientist Exposes Dangers of Electromagnetic Fields













Kevin Samson, Guest
Waking Times

Neuroscience has come under scrutiny for its involvement in an array of mind control initiatives and other ethically questionable research. But at least one neuroscientist from Sweden has gone on record to caution against the increasing dangers of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) on human beings … More

April 14, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More
On the Eve of Construction

On the Eve of Construction













Zen Gardner, Guest
Waking Times

I love the sound of construction. I always have. Not the industrial sound from the kind of massive, offensive structures made with other-worldly looking machines, but the intentional, gentle kind. Small structures going up, improvements on homes, road repairs, even tending to gardens whether … More

April 13, 2014 | By | 2 Replies More

Activism Works

Ecuador Will Have Referendum on Fate of Yasuni After Activists Collect Over 700,000 Signatures

Ecuador Will Have Referendum on Fate of Yasuni After Activists Collect Over 700,000 Signatures













Jeremy Hance, Mongabay
Waking Times

In what is a major victory for environmentalists, campaigners with United for Yasuni have collected 727,947 signatures triggering a national referendum on whether or not oil drilling should proceed in three blocs of Yasuni National Park in Ecuador. The effort started last year after Ecuador’s … More

April 17, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More
The Truth About Fluoride Becoming More Widely Known

The Truth About Fluoride Becoming More Widely Known













Dr. Mercola
Waking Times

Fluoride is a poisonous substance added to many municipal water supplies across the US, Canada, and elsewhere without the permission of the residents. Is there a model that communities can follow to remove it from their water supply? The short answer to this question is yesMore

April 1, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More
6 Crimes Against Nature Perpetrated By The Food Industry

6 Crimes Against Nature Perpetrated By The Food Industry













Martha Rosenberg, AlterNet
Waking Times

While many procedures on factory farms are cruel, breeding animals into mutants and violating mother/offspring bonds are truly crimes against nature.

The horrors of factory farming are multifold. Treating animals like heads of lettuce—”forget it’s an animal” says one farming magazine—has created institutionalized ruthlessness toward … More

March 28, 2014 | By | 5 Replies More
Our Respective Journeys Into the Valley of Reason

Our Respective Journeys Into the Valley of Reason













Michael T. Winter, Contributor
Waking Times

The Internet awakening has given birth to a worldwide multitude of people that are disengaging from the programmed paradigm created for us, and awakening to the reality of the dangers we face. The web has supplied a platform for writers to take a crack … More

March 26, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More
13 Ways Foodies Are Changing The Food Industry

13 Ways Foodies Are Changing The Food Industry













Heather Callaghan & Jeffrey Green, Guests
Waking Times

A major shift in the consciousness of food consumers is forcing the industry into a competitive race to become more natural.  The market is telling food producers that they no longer want so-called factory food because of its many harmful effects on … More

March 25, 2014 | By | 1 Reply More