Comments on: US Scientists Find That Chemotherapy Boosts Cancer Growth

By: viagra

viagra — Sun, 09 Jun 2013 13:07:39 +0000

Wow, that’s what I was looking for, what a data! present here at this weblog, thanks admin of this website.

By: Jim Redman

Jim Redman — Mon, 03 Jun 2013 01:31:59 +0000

The original research reference in case anyone is interested

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22863786

By: And now we join reality...

And now we join reality... — Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:58:21 +0000

Really?! Sorry, as someone with stage IV metastatic cancer, I can say that’s short-sided thinking. I’m only alive right now because of chemo – not almonds, apricot pits, rainbows or unicorns.

By: Kert

Kert — Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:39:19 +0000

When it comes to cancer research and treatment then search for Royal Raymond Rife! Here is a documentary that reveals why this great invention that could be used today for curing safely not only cancer but also many other diseases, is not in use today:
http://archive.org/details/RoyalRaymondRife

You will be surprised as I was! Why an earth is this man forgotten.

Kert

By: Gail

Gail — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:09:02 +0000

95% of cancer is not genetic (Read Dr. Samuel Epstein’s books). Also, take a look at a book called “The Politics in Healing” by Dan Haley. He was a member of the NY State Legislature. Political harassment, suppression, the AMA (American Medical Association), the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). Follow the money. AMA receives income from advertising from the pharmaceutical drug companies. Many employees in the FDA have gone to work for the pharmaceutical companies, the sector they were regulating, when they retire from government. Impediments to non-toxic health breakthroughs are seen by this author as the FDA and doctors not free to use effective non-toxic therapies. Read the true stories in this book that illustrate these concerns. Natural approaches used, the results and the attempt to shut it down. Educate yourself to the impact on your welfare.

By: victoria

victoria — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:06:27 +0000

What do these do?

By: victoria

victoria — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:56:44 +0000

The Gerson Institute gerson.com.

By: ChewyBees

ChewyBees — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:37:36 +0000

The cause cannot be ‘truly’ known as there are myriad causes, as well as multiple factors that must come together for cancer to reach a growth size that it can no longer be taken care of by the body’s own systems. More than likely, every single adult human has had cancer in some stage many times in their life, the body just happened to take care of it using it’s own immune and purification systems. For a cancer to grow, inhibit and then take over a major organ or multiple organs means the underlying causes have been going on for sometime, and the environment the cancer is living in is established as beneficial to cancer and not the body. It is at this point that the causes can be discovered and defined, and then rapid, extreme changes made from unhealthy to healthy. With many cancers, breast cancer and prostate cancer especially, the ‘rush to treatment’ is hardly necessary in most cases (as cancer is still developmental upon discovery), but is recommended by scareware doctors to get the pharma juice mainlining as fast as they can. Otherwise, a cancer patient might opt for something else after doing their own research.

My opinion on the most common factors that allow cancer to develop: lack of oxygen and clean air in general, a mental and physical environment of unhealthy stress, artificial food and drinks, anything above a low sugar diet (including fruits and grains), impure water containing trace amounts of poisonous chemicals, pharmaceuticals, mercury, lead, chlorine and fluoride to name a few, a lack of exercise, or in some cases, too much exercise. Alcohol and tobacco go without saying, but in moderation outside of the above factors, neither is any more harmful than the rest of the list.

The above list are all factors that tax the immune system and organs, keeping them from doing the necessary work of guarding against dis-ease and purifying the system. I was always astounded at how much stress is added to the situation as soon as the cancer is discovered. It is this way because the ‘cure’ that big pharma is racing for is billed several hundred large from the insurance companies, and thus is a huge cash cow for corporations that have no feeling, empathy or care for the outcome, only the treatment…

Energy healing is something I truly believe in, but from my understanding, once the chemo starts, that option is negated.

Read Bengstrom’s book Energy Cure. It’s an eye opener…

By: Gail

Gail — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:43:29 +0000

My natural vet was using this with pets, a few years ago.

By: Gail

Gail — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:34:59 +0000

I agree with you. I had cancer. Only 11 months after my mother died of breast cancer, I got it. My tumor was not genetic. Government breast cancer mortality map correlates with government nuclear map, across the country. I also learned from Dr. Samuel Epstein (occupational and environmental medicine) that 10 years of mammogram = the same radiation as if you live within 1 /2 mile of Hiroshima. Thermal Imaging can find breast cancer up to 10 years before mammogram, without radiation, in color. Some hospitals want to get a return on the mammogram equipment and so are unlikely to promote thermal imaging; this said by 2 oncologists. Also: GE and Westinghouse make nuclear plants. GE makes mammogram machine and GE makes radiation machine. Radiation causes cancer. The medical industrial complex is big business. Pursuit of ph balence of body saved my life for lung cancer 5 years after radiation treatment for breast cancer. Got to build up immine systme and do not stuff angry feelings, it may lower your immune system