Comments on: Nano-Tech Gone Wild: Bill Gates Funds Development of Cloth That Delivers Contraceptive and HIV Drugs

By: Tom

Tom — Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:18:59 +0000

As true as that might be, this is exactly the reaction they wanted from you for decades, if not longer.

Their wet dream for you to NOT WANT to reproduce.

You’re doing their best work for them.

By: suezz

suezz — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:51:54 +0000

if bill gates is behind it you can count me out. he is as corrupt as they come and I wish he would just go live where ever he wants and leave the rest of the world alone but I know his little ego won’t have any of that.

By: rgrtghrt

rgrtghrt — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:40:59 +0000

LOLLLLLLLLLLL this species is totally insane

By: PJ London

PJ London — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:52:09 +0000

The real problem, is how will you know?
You would never knowingly buy / use poisoned clothes but how will you tell?
In the Rhodesian bush war, they impregnated clothes with poisons, and then put them on the top shelves at the back of the store. Only the Terrorists/ Freedom fighters (take your pick) would steal the clothes and obviously the store owner would never sell them.
I don’t remember whether they were ever effective.

By: Tamara

Tamara — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:50:44 +0000

So if I don’t trust a pill or injection, why the heck would I trust a piece of cloth? It’s still a chemical and if I don’t trust the chemical in the first place I’m definatly NOT going to wear it as clothing!

What happens if it gets wet? if it gets into the environment, into drinking water? How do we know these nanoparticles are safe? what if they damage the animals/plants or make people horribly sick over time? What if it ends up killing people/ animals/ plants? In this rush to stop overpopulation (which I don’t believe is happening, see the website for Overpopulation is A Myth), we are introducing things into the environment, and into human life, that is NOT natural and could cause a great deal of damage to our health and other creatures health. The environment, and our bodies, are having things introduced they are not used to or designed to interact with. This is very, very dangerous and we have to stop this madness!!!

By: Ann

Ann — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:01:58 +0000

Nano-tech gone wild, indeed, but there is no mention of the possible carcinogenic effects nano-particles accumulating in the human body. I guess, we’ll just have to wait until enough people succumb to the effect of these particles and epidemiologists conduct their studies before we’ll find out, as usual.

By: John Aspray

John Aspray — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:49:47 +0000

The contraceptive clothing was invented in the 1970′s under a general label of ‘Cool gear’. Commonly purchased through catalogues on the ‘never never’ the ‘gear’ would usually be gawdy enough to repel anyone ‘looking for lurve’. That’s why Jimmy Savile had to force himself on his victims. It wasn’t that they didn’t like him, it was just his dress code.

By: XYZ

XYZ — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:27:33 +0000

true

By: Chips

Chips — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 01:51:37 +0000

May I say that while I do not endorse state limits on reproduction, I do support information that cautions the “fertile” about the hazard of child rearing and parenting in this godawful environment{today}. The government and its stepchild,education are extremely malfunctional. Do you want to {re}produce welfare owned children? Until the corrupt corporate control model is replaced by voluntary sustainable communal unity projects I call for the young fertiles to say NO to breeding for the Man[banker royalty slaveowners]. This is the revolution we needed in the sixties.