Zen Gardner

This should add some more fuel to the artificial moon argument. Could this curious find be more proof our moon is not natural, but manufactured? Let this broaden your horizons.

Any way you look it, this has some remarkable information about our amazing Universe that’s unfolding before us.

Nanoparticles found in moon glass bubbles explain weird lunar soil behaviour

A stunning discovery by Queensland University of Technology soil scientist Marek Zbik of nanoparticles inside bubbles of glass in lunar soil could solve the mystery of why the moon’s surface topsoil has many unusual properties.

Dr Zbik, from Queensland University of Technology’s Science and Engineering Faculty, said scientists had long observed the strange behaviour of lunar soilbut had not taken much notice of the nano and submicron particles found in the soil and their source was unknown.

Dr Zbik took the lunar soil samples to Taiwan where he could study the glass bubbles without breaking them using a new technique for studying nano materials call synchrotron-based nano tomography to look at the particles. Nano tomography is a transmission X-ray microscope which enables 3D images of nanoparticles to be made.

View a 3D image from inside the lunar bubble using transmission X-Ray microscopy. You can see what is inside the lunar bubble with 3D glasses.

“We were really surprised at what we found,” Dr Zbik said.

“Instead of gas or vapour inside the bubbles, which we would expect to find in such bubbles on Earth, the lunar glass bubbles were filled with a highly porous network of alien-looking glassy particles that span the bubbles’ interior.

“Alien-looking glassy particles”. Interesting choice of words, wouldn’t you say?

“It appears that the nanoparticles are formed inside bubbles of molten rocks when meteorites hit the lunar surface. Then they are released when the glass bubbles are pulverised by the consequent bombardment of meteorites on the moon’s surface.

“This continuous pulverising of rocks on the lunar surface and constant mixing develop a type of soil which is unknown on Earth.”

Dr Zbik said nanoparticles behaved according to the laws of quantum physics which were completely different from so called ‘normal’ physics’ laws. Because of this, materials containing nanoparticles behave strangely according to our current understanding.

“Nanoparticles are so tiny, it is their size and not what they are made of that accounts for their exceptional properties.

“We don’t understand a lot about quantum physics yet but it could be that these nanoparticles, when liberated from their glass bubble, mix with the other soil constituents and give lunar soil its unusual properties.

“Lunar soil is electro-statically charged so it hovers above the surface; it is extremely chemically active; and it has low thermal conductivity eg it can be 160 degrees above the surface but -40 degrees two metres below the surface.

“It is also very sticky and brittle such that its particles wear the surface off metal and glass.”  (Source)

So…

I’m no particle scientist but this does appear rather strange. Why would nanoparticles be formed inside of molten bubbles and yet be released by the same type of impact? I can understand someone assuming that and perhaps it’s true.

But could it be these encased nanoparticles are engineered to cover the surface of this enigmatic orb called our moon by an alien race to generate the exact effects described above?

They sure do the job.

Look at the amazing insulation and reflective properties. And that lunar soil is thereby electro-statically charged, is extremely chemically active and even “hovers” over the surface, yet it’s sticky, so as not to fly around but keep a more even distribution perhaps? Is the very soil a sort of electro-magnetic amplifier as well as protective buffer for the Moon, and perhaps its cargo?

Instead of the flat earth mindset of trying to fit it into the earthbound paradigm, let’s work this backwards.

Assume the moon is a manufactured orb instead of a naturally formed celestial body. After all, it doesn’t fit any other criteria for what a normal moon should be in relation to earth. If you were to engineer a simple, resilient, reflective insulating electrically active unit for covering a surface, wouldn’t a simple silicon based glass bubble with a reinforced nano-particle lattice-filled interior fit the bill?

Very curious indeed.

More Moon Anomalies…

As you know, this discussion regarding the Moon’s origin has been ongoing for a long, long time.

After years of research, two Soviet scientists came to the conclusion that the moon must be an artificial object that was brought into orbit around the earth and is inhabited by intelligent life. With a compelling argument.

This conclusion is held by many who have studied this subject. Many historical texts also tell of the day when the moon wasn’t in our skies yet, clearly implying it “arrived” in some fashion, which doubtfully was the breaking off from earth as most conjecture, otherwise there would be no such history to speak of.

Certainly worth taking a look at.

It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the Moon is not what it appears; that it is not just another satellite orbiting a planet, Earth, but an entity which has thrown the minds of some of the greatest thinkers and scientific brains into a quandary and bewilderment unprecedented in the history of astronomy. Why haven’t you heard about this? Another government cover-up? How could Moon mysteries have anything to do with government secrecy, and moreover could it relate to the suppression of the space programme?

Let us outline some of the extraordinary anomalies and mysteries surrounding this puzzle. Clearly not all data will be equally reliable but the abundance of interrelated information nevertheless gives an overall picture which can be determined with some certainty. The first academic enigma must surely be that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size. However, this would presumably be based on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with 5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow. The eminent scientist Carl Sagan, a typical sceptic, made the statement, ‘A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object’. But meaning here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite—and therefore artificial.

Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a ‘hollow object’ comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. The same effect occurred with Apollo 13′s third stage which caused the Moon to ring for over three hours. So what’s going on with the Moon?

Two Soviet scientists, Vasin and Shcherbokov, have spent much of their careers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their conclusion is that the Moon is artificial, possibly a hollowed-out planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of the galaxy into a circular orbit around our planet (hence the extraordinary mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations). They claim that intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons.

Furthermore…

It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon’s surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal—which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick—mostly metal. (Source)

Keep Wondering. That’s What It’s All About.

While science is revealing tid-bits of new evidence, more and more we’re learning to be led by our hearts, our true consciousness, for lack of knowledge and information and empirical data that we’re deliberately deprived of. David Icke is a wonderful example of this. While some of his ideas may seem outlandish to some, it’s amazing how many profoundly impactful understandings he’s had that have proven to be true.

So why not take a look at other new ideas through other doors of perception?  You might be happily surprised at what resonates.

Balance the world of knowledge, known and unknown, with a greater sense of totality and connectivity. We don’t need to force any conclusions, they’ll just manifest. The beauty is we’re free from the confines of the mind and the rigidity of false paradigms.

But at least look around and consider. No hurry. Just know, if you’re truly open new understandings will come your way. And those too will continue to change. That’s the beauty of it. It’s all fluid and we need to learn to roll with it.

We’re developing our intuitive senses that are much, much more powerful than anything else in our human arsenal. That inner voice is the True compass, the True voice, the True source. The great common heart within us all connected to an infinite, creative Universe.

Develop that and we join in with the wonder, mystery and eternal creative power of a loving, unfolding Universe!

Enjoy the ride!

Love, Zen

~~ Help Waking Times to raise the vibration by sharing this article with the buttons below…